The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Totalitarian and authoritarian regimes
Abstract
In this classic work, noted political sociologist Juan Linz provides an unparalleled study of the nature of nondemocratic regimes. Linz's seminal analysis develops the fundamental distinction between totalitarian and authoritarian systems. It also presents a pathbreaking discussion of the personalistic, lawless, nonideological type of authoritarian rule that he calls (following Weber) the sultanistic regime. The core of the book (including a 40-page bibliography) was published in 1975 as a chapter in the Handbook of Political Science, long out of print. The author has chosen not to change the original text for this new edition, but instead has added an extensive introduction reflecting on some of the contributions to the literature and the changes that have taken place in world politics and in the nature of regimes since the 1970s.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Politics of Authoritarian Rule
Svolik, M. W. (2012) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139176040 · Cited by 2,611
Credible Power-Sharing and the Longevity of Authoritarian Rule
Magaloni, B. (2008) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414007313124 · Cited by 1,121
Pathways from Authoritarianism
Hadenius, A., & Teorell, J. (2007) · Journal of Democracy · doi:10.1353/jod.2007.0009 · Cited by 813
Democracy as a Latent Variable
Treier, S., & Jackman, S. (2008) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00308.x · Cited by 680
The Strategy of Paired Comparison: Toward a Theory of Practice
Tarrow, S. (2010) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414009350044 · Cited by 597
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2001-06-01
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 38-5813-38-5813
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1589559699
- Cited by
- 716
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Totalitarian and authoritarian regimes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.38-5813
- The paper
- Totalitarian and authoritarian regimes. (2001). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.38-5813
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.