Cited by 21Intergenerational Family Dynamics and CaregivingAging, Elder Care, and Social IssuesFamily Dynamics and Relationships

The Chinese Postreform Generation as Caregivers: The Caregiving Intentions Toward Parents and Parents-in-Law of the One-Child Generation

Open access
Warmenhoven, Helmut, Hoebink, Paul R. J., Janssens, Jan M. A. M.·2018·Journal of Family Issues

Abstract

The problem of population aging in China has been widely documented. As a result of decreasing birth rates due to the Chinese one-child policy, birth rates have decreased dramatically, while life expectancy has increased. By 2040, it is expected that 24.6% of the Chinese population will be older than 65 years (United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, 2015), with the majority of the elderly care likely to fall to their, often, singleton children. Little research has been conducted, however, with this future generation of caregivers. This article reports on a mixed-methods study comparing the attitudes of the one-child generation toward the future care of their parents and parents-in-law, in terms of gender, sibling status, and urban/rural providence. It includes the results of 26 in-depth interviews with students aged 18 to 22 years, and a survey among 351 first-year students of a semiprivate university in Zhuhai (China). No differences were found for gender, sibling status, or urban/rural providence for the intention to take care of the own parents in the future, although rural and nonsingleton participants were more likely to mention that they intended to live close to, or with their parents in the future than their urban and singleton counterparts. Concerning the care for future parents-in-law, male students in both the survey and the interviews were significantly less likely to accept responsibility for their care than female students, but no differences were found for urban/rural providence or for sibling status in this respect. Finally, female and rural students were found to be significantly much more likely to want to live in a separate house than their male and urban counterparts.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0192513x18789208

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The caregiving role of China's only children has drawn attention in fields such as nursing and sociology.

    “The caregiving role of China’s only children has drawn attention in fields such as nursing and sociology (18–21).”

    From Caring alone: older adult care burdens, practices, and structural imbalances among China's one-child generation (2025) · cites this paper as [21]

    The Abstract describes growing concern about care by the one-child generation and identifies earlier studies of their caregiving intentions. The References include work in Gender & Society and a health-care journal, supporting scholarly attention to the topic, but the passages do not establish attention specifically in nursing. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Bai X. Lai D. W. L. Guo A. (2016). Ageism and depression: Perceptions of older people as a burden in China. Journal of Social Issues, 72, 26- 46. doi: 10.1111/josi.12154 · DOI
  2. Bongaarts J. Greenhalgh S. (1985). An alternative to the one-child policy in China. Population and Development Review, 11, 585- 617. doi: 10.2307/1973456 · DOI
  3. Cooney R. S. Di J. (1999). Primary family caregivers of impaired elderly in Shanghai, China: Kin relationship and caregiver burden. Research on Aging, 21, 739- 761. doi: 10.1177/0164027599216002 · DOI
  4. Croll E. J. (1995). Changing identity of Chinese women: Rhetoric, experience and self-perception in the twentieth-century China. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
  5. Das Gupta M. Jiang Z. Bohua Li B. Xie Z. Chung W. Bae H (2003). Why is son preference so persistent in East and South Asia? A cross-country study of China, India and the Republic of Korea. Journal of Development Studies, 40, 153- 187. doi: 10.1080/00220380412331293807 · DOI
  6. Festini F. de Martino M. (2004). Twenty five years of the one child family policy in China. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 58, 358- 360. doi: 10.1136/jech.2003.017335 15082728 PMC1732772 · DOI
  7. Greenhalgh S. (2003). Planned birth, unplanned persons: “Population” in the making of Chinese modernity. American Ethnologist, 30, 196- 215. doi: 10.1525/ae.2003.30.2.196 · DOI
  8. Greenhalgh S. (2010). Cultivating global citizens: Population in the rise of China. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  9. Hu Y. Scott J. (2016). Family and gender values in China: Generational, geographic, and gender differences. Journal of Family Issues, 37, 1267- 1293. doi: 10.1177/0192513X14528710 · DOI
  10. Ikels C. (2006). Economic reform and intergenerational relationships in China. Oxford Development Studies, 34, 387- 400. doi: 10.1080/13600810601045619 · DOI
  11. Legge J. (1879). The sacred books of China. Vol. 1 Reprint New Delhi: Atlantic Publishers & Distributors.
  12. Li S. Feldman M. W. Jin X. (2004). Children, marriage form, and family support for the elderly in contemporary rural China: The case of Songzi. Research on Aging, 26, 352- 384. doi: 10.1177/0164027503262477 · DOI
  13. Liu F. (2008). Negotiating the filial self: Young–adult only–children and intergenerational relationships in China. Young, 16, 409- 430. doi: 10.1177/110330880801600404 · DOI
  14. Lu L. Gilmour R. (2004). Culture, self and ways to achieve SWB: A cross-cultural analysis. Journal of Psychology in Chinese Societies, 5, 51- 79.
  15. Lu L. Kao S. F. (2002). Traditional and modern characteristics across the generations: Similarities and discrepancies. Journal of Social Psychology, 142, 45- 59. doi: 10.1080/00224540209603884 11913834 · DOI
  16. Murphy R. (2014). Sex ratio imbalances and China’s Care for Girls Programme: A case study of a social problem. China Quarterly, 219, 781- 807. doi: 10.1017/S0305741014000691 · DOI
  17. Nurmi J.-E. (1991). How do adolescents see their future? A review of the development of future orientation and planning. Developmental Review, 11(1), 1- 59. doi: 10.1016/0273-2297(91)90002-6 · DOI
  18. Settles B. H. Sheng X. Zang Y. Zhao J. (2013). The one-child policy and its impact on Chinese families. In Chan K. (Ed.), International handbook of Chinese families (pp. 627- 646). New York, NY: Springer.
  19. Sheng X. (2005). Chinese families. In Adams B. N. Trost J. (Eds.), Handbook of world families (pp. 99- 128). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  20. Shi L. (2009). “Little quilted vests to warm parents’ hearts”: Redefining the gendered practice of filial piety in rural north-eastern China. China Quarterly, 198, 348- 363. doi: 10.1017/S0305741009000344 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Stockman N. (2000). Understanding Chinese society. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
  22. Sun R. (2002). Old age support in contemporary urban China from both parents’ and children’s perspectives. Research on Aging, 24, 337- 359. doi: 10.1177/0164027502243003 · DOI
  23. Zhan H. J. (2004). Willingness and expectations: Intergenerational differences in attitudes toward filial responsibility in China. Marriage & Family Review, 36, 175- 200. doi: 10.1300/J002v36n01_08 · DOI
  24. Zhan H. J. (2005). Aging, health care, and elder care: Perpetuation of gender inequalities in China. Health Care for Women International, 26, 693- 712. doi: 10.1080/07399330500177196 16234212 · DOI
  25. Zhan H. J. Montgomery R. J. V. (2003). Gender and elder care in China: The influence of filial piety and structural constraints. Gender & Society, 17, 209- 229. doi: 10.1177/0891243202250734 · DOI
  26. Zhang Y. Goza F. W. (2006). Who will care for the elderly in China? A review of the problems caused by China’s one-child policy and their potential solutions. Journal of Aging Studies, 20, 151- 164. doi: 10.1016/j.jaging.2005.07.002 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Warmenhoven, H., Hoebink, P. R. J., & Janssens, J. M. A. M.
Affiliations
  • Beijing Normal-Hong Kong Baptist University (CN)
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
Corresponding author
Warmenhoven, Helmut
Venue
Journal of Family Issues
Published
2018-07-22
Volume
39
Issue
14
Pages
3690-3712
ISSN
  • 0192-513X (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5481
OpenAlex
W2883016999
Cited by
21
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
FWCI
2.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Family Issues (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
Keywords
one-child policy, population aging, intergenerational caregiving, gender differences, sibling status, urban-rural differences, living arrangements, elderly care, young adults

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review