The Chinese Postreform Generation as Caregivers: The Caregiving Intentions Toward Parents and Parents-in-Law of the One-Child Generation
Open accessAbstract
The problem of population aging in China has been widely documented. As a result of decreasing birth rates due to the Chinese one-child policy, birth rates have decreased dramatically, while life expectancy has increased. By 2040, it is expected that 24.6% of the Chinese population will be older than 65 years (United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, 2015), with the majority of the elderly care likely to fall to their, often, singleton children. Little research has been conducted, however, with this future generation of caregivers. This article reports on a mixed-methods study comparing the attitudes of the one-child generation toward the future care of their parents and parents-in-law, in terms of gender, sibling status, and urban/rural providence. It includes the results of 26 in-depth interviews with students aged 18 to 22 years, and a survey among 351 first-year students of a semiprivate university in Zhuhai (China). No differences were found for gender, sibling status, or urban/rural providence for the intention to take care of the own parents in the future, although rural and nonsingleton participants were more likely to mention that they intended to live close to, or with their parents in the future than their urban and singleton counterparts. Concerning the care for future parents-in-law, male students in both the survey and the interviews were significantly less likely to accept responsibility for their care than female students, but no differences were found for urban/rural providence or for sibling status in this respect. Finally, female and rural students were found to be significantly much more likely to want to live in a separate house than their male and urban counterparts.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The caregiving role of China's only children has drawn attention in fields such as nursing and sociology.
“The caregiving role of China’s only children has drawn attention in fields such as nursing and sociology (18–21).”
From Caring alone: older adult care burdens, practices, and structural imbalances among China's one-child generation (2025) · cites this paper as [21]
The Abstract describes growing concern about care by the one-child generation and identifies earlier studies of their caregiving intentions. The References include work in Gender & Society and a health-care journal, supporting scholarly attention to the topic, but the passages do not establish attention specifically in nursing. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Only Hope: Coming of Age Under China’s One-Child Policy
Fong, V. L. (2004) · doi:10.1515/9781503624689 · Cited by 607 · see citing works
Filial Piety, Patrilineality, and China's One-Child Policy
Deutsch, F. M. (2006) · Journal of Family Issues · doi:10.1177/0192513x05283097 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Older parents enjoy better filial piety and care from daughters than sons in China
(2016) · American Journal of Medical Research · doi:10.22381/ajmr3120169 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 26
- Bai X. Lai D. W. L. Guo A. (2016). Ageism and depression: Perceptions of older people as a burden in China. Journal of Social Issues, 72, 26- 46. doi: 10.1111/josi.12154 · DOI
- Bongaarts J. Greenhalgh S. (1985). An alternative to the one-child policy in China. Population and Development Review, 11, 585- 617. doi: 10.2307/1973456 · DOI
- Cooney R. S. Di J. (1999). Primary family caregivers of impaired elderly in Shanghai, China: Kin relationship and caregiver burden. Research on Aging, 21, 739- 761. doi: 10.1177/0164027599216002 · DOI
- Croll E. J. (1995). Changing identity of Chinese women: Rhetoric, experience and self-perception in the twentieth-century China. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
- Das Gupta M. Jiang Z. Bohua Li B. Xie Z. Chung W. Bae H (2003). Why is son preference so persistent in East and South Asia? A cross-country study of China, India and the Republic of Korea. Journal of Development Studies, 40, 153- 187. doi: 10.1080/00220380412331293807 · DOI
- Festini F. de Martino M. (2004). Twenty five years of the one child family policy in China. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 58, 358- 360. doi: 10.1136/jech.2003.017335 15082728 PMC1732772 · DOI
- Greenhalgh S. (2003). Planned birth, unplanned persons: “Population” in the making of Chinese modernity. American Ethnologist, 30, 196- 215. doi: 10.1525/ae.2003.30.2.196 · DOI
- Greenhalgh S. (2010). Cultivating global citizens: Population in the rise of China. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Hu Y. Scott J. (2016). Family and gender values in China: Generational, geographic, and gender differences. Journal of Family Issues, 37, 1267- 1293. doi: 10.1177/0192513X14528710 · DOI
- Ikels C. (2006). Economic reform and intergenerational relationships in China. Oxford Development Studies, 34, 387- 400. doi: 10.1080/13600810601045619 · DOI
- Legge J. (1879). The sacred books of China. Vol. 1 Reprint New Delhi: Atlantic Publishers & Distributors.
- Li S. Feldman M. W. Jin X. (2004). Children, marriage form, and family support for the elderly in contemporary rural China: The case of Songzi. Research on Aging, 26, 352- 384. doi: 10.1177/0164027503262477 · DOI
- Liu F. (2008). Negotiating the filial self: Young–adult only–children and intergenerational relationships in China. Young, 16, 409- 430. doi: 10.1177/110330880801600404 · DOI
- Lu L. Gilmour R. (2004). Culture, self and ways to achieve SWB: A cross-cultural analysis. Journal of Psychology in Chinese Societies, 5, 51- 79.
- Lu L. Kao S. F. (2002). Traditional and modern characteristics across the generations: Similarities and discrepancies. Journal of Social Psychology, 142, 45- 59. doi: 10.1080/00224540209603884 11913834 · DOI
- Murphy R. (2014). Sex ratio imbalances and China’s Care for Girls Programme: A case study of a social problem. China Quarterly, 219, 781- 807. doi: 10.1017/S0305741014000691 · DOI
- Nurmi J.-E. (1991). How do adolescents see their future? A review of the development of future orientation and planning. Developmental Review, 11(1), 1- 59. doi: 10.1016/0273-2297(91)90002-6 · DOI
- Settles B. H. Sheng X. Zang Y. Zhao J. (2013). The one-child policy and its impact on Chinese families. In Chan K. (Ed.), International handbook of Chinese families (pp. 627- 646). New York, NY: Springer.
- Sheng X. (2005). Chinese families. In Adams B. N. Trost J. (Eds.), Handbook of world families (pp. 99- 128). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Shi L. (2009). “Little quilted vests to warm parents’ hearts”: Redefining the gendered practice of filial piety in rural north-eastern China. China Quarterly, 198, 348- 363. doi: 10.1017/S0305741009000344 · DOI · Paper page
- Stockman N. (2000). Understanding Chinese society. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
- Sun R. (2002). Old age support in contemporary urban China from both parents’ and children’s perspectives. Research on Aging, 24, 337- 359. doi: 10.1177/0164027502243003 · DOI
- Zhan H. J. (2004). Willingness and expectations: Intergenerational differences in attitudes toward filial responsibility in China. Marriage & Family Review, 36, 175- 200. doi: 10.1300/J002v36n01_08 · DOI
- Zhan H. J. (2005). Aging, health care, and elder care: Perpetuation of gender inequalities in China. Health Care for Women International, 26, 693- 712. doi: 10.1080/07399330500177196 16234212 · DOI
- Zhan H. J. Montgomery R. J. V. (2003). Gender and elder care in China: The influence of filial piety and structural constraints. Gender & Society, 17, 209- 229. doi: 10.1177/0891243202250734 · DOI
- Zhang Y. Goza F. W. (2006). Who will care for the elderly in China? A review of the problems caused by China’s one-child policy and their potential solutions. Journal of Aging Studies, 20, 151- 164. doi: 10.1016/j.jaging.2005.07.002 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Parental care among only children in China: motivation, provision, and experiences
Shen, Y., Ciobanu, R. O., van der Horst, M., Kliegel, M., & van Tilburg, T. G. (2025) · Journal of Social and Personal Relationships · doi:10.1177/02654075251346370 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Xiang, S., Xiang, H., Ren, Q., & Deng, Q. (2025) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1694636 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
- Authors
- Warmenhoven, H., Hoebink, P. R. J., & Janssens, J. M. A. M.
- Affiliations
- Beijing Normal-Hong Kong Baptist University (CN)
- Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Warmenhoven, Helmut
- Venue
- Journal of Family Issues
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2018-07-22
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 3690-3712
- ISSN
- 0192-513X (ISSN-L)
- 1552-5481
- PMC
- PMC6137644
- OpenAlex
- W2883016999
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 2.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Family Issues (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
- Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
- Keywords
- one-child policy, population aging, intergenerational caregiving, gender differences, sibling status, urban-rural differences, living arrangements, elderly care, young adults
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review