Cited by 49Carcinogens and Genotoxicity AssessmentAnimal testing and alternativesImmunotoxicology and immune responses

Commentary: Update on Animal Models for NTP Studies

Open access
King-Herbert, Angela P., Sills, Robert C., Bucher, John R.·2010·Toxicologic Pathology

Abstract

Based on recommendations of participants at the National Toxicology Program (NTP) workshop ‘‘Animal Models for the NTP Cancer Bioassay: Strains and Stocks—Should We Switch?’’ some modifications to the NTP rodent cancer bioassay were made. The B6C3F1 remains the mouse model used in the cancer bioassay. The use of multiple strains of mice will be explored through a new branch within the NTP, the Host Susceptibility Branch. Several rat models were evaluated; the Harlan Sprague Dawley rat is currently being used in the NTP studies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0192623309356450

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
King-Herbert, A. P., Sills, R. C., & Bucher, J. R.
Affiliations
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Venue
Toxicologic Pathology
Published
2009-12-17
Volume
38
Issue
1
Pages
180-181
ISSN
  • 0192-6233 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-1601
OpenAlex
W2155830966
Cited by
49
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Toxicologic Pathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotoxicology and immune responses
Keywords
animal models, National Toxicology Program, B6C3F1 mice, mouse strains, host susceptibility, Sprague-Dawley rats, carcinogenicity testing
MeSH terms
Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Rats, Inbred F344, Carcinogenicity Tests, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Mice, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review