The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Do Teacher Induction and Mentoring Matter?
Open accessAbstract
In recent years there has been a growing interest in support, guidance, and orientation programs-collectively known as induction-for beginning elementary and secondary teachers during the transition into their first teaching jobs. This study examines whether such supports have a positive effect on the retention of beginning teachers. The study alsofocuses on different types and components of induction, including mentoring programs, collective group activities, and the provision of extra resources and reduced workloads. The results indicate that beginning teachers who were provided with multiple supports, were less likely to move to other schools and less likely to leave the teaching occupation altogether after their first year. Some forms of assistance and support, however, did not appear to increase beginners' retention.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Teacher Turnover and Teacher Shortages: An Organizational Analysis
Ingersoll, R. M. (2001) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312038003499 · Cited by 2,989
Self-citationThe One Best System: A History of American Urban Education
TYACK, D. B. (1974) · doi:10.2307/j.ctv136c61j · Cited by 1,070
Pursuing a “Sense of Success”: New Teachers Explain Their Career Decisions
Johnson, S. M., & Birkeland, S. E. (2003) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312040003581 · Cited by 932
Cited by
Ingersoll, R. M., & Strong, M. (2011) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654311403323 · Cited by 1,506
Self-citationA Coming Crisis in Teaching? Teacher Supply, Demand, and Shortages in the U.S.
Sutcher, L., Darling-Hammond, L., & Carver-Thomas, D. (2016) · doi:10.54300/247.242 · Cited by 718
Canrinus, E. T., Helms-Lorenz, M., Beijaard, D., Buitink, J., & Hofman, A. (2012) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-011-0069-2 · Cited by 524
Beginning Teacher Induction What the Data Tell Us
Ingersoll, R. M. (2012) · Phi Delta Kappan · doi:10.1177/003172171209300811 · Cited by 398
Self-citationExpanding computer science education in schools: understanding teacher experiences and challenges
Yadav, A., Gretter, S., Hambrusch, S., & Sands, P. (2016) · Computer Science Education · doi:10.1080/08993408.2016.1257418 · Cited by 308
Metadata
- Authors
- Ingersoll, R. M., & Smith, T. M.
- Venue
- NASSP Bulletin
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2004-03
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 638
- Pages
- 28-40
- ISSN
- 0192-6365 (ISSN-L)
- 1930-1405
- OpenAlex
- W2091617221
- Cited by
- 569
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 49.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Do Teacher Induction and Mentoring Matter? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/019263650408863803
- The paper
- Ingersoll, R. M., & Smith, T. M. (2004). Do Teacher Induction and Mentoring Matter? NASSP Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1177/019263650408863803
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.