Cited by 22Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesCardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsCardiac pacing and defibrillation studies

Predictors of sinus rhythm after radiofrequency maze and mitral valve surgery

Chaiyaroj, Suchart, Ngarmukos, Tachapong, Lertsithichai, Panuwat·2008·Asian Cardiovascular and Thoracic Annals

Abstract

The prevalence and predictors of postoperative sinus rhythm in patients undergoing a radiofrequency ablation maze operation and mitral valve surgery were assessed in 63 patients of whom 54 (86%) were in permanent atrial fibrillation. Operative mortality was 3.17%. At a median follow-up of 18 months, 54 (88.5%) patients were in sinus rhythm and 7 (11.5%) were in atrial fibrillation. The probability of sinus rhythm at 30 months was 92%. Left atrial diameter was the most significant prognostic factor for sinus rhythm on multivariate proportional-hazard regression analysis. The cutoff value of preoperative left atrial diameter for predicting persistent atrial fibrillation at 6 months was 6 cm (100% sensitivity and 73.6% specificity). The radiofrequency ablation maze operation can be performed in addition to mitral surgery with a high rate of successful conversion to sinus rhythm. Preoperative left atrial diameter < 6 cm is an important prognostic factor for sinus rhythm conversion.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/021849230801600407

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Predictors of atrial fibrillation recurrence after surgery include left atrial dilatation, older age, >10-year history of atrial fibrillation, and non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

    “Predictors of AF recurrence after surgery include left atrial dilatation, older age, > 10-year history of AF, and non-paroxysmal AF. [800][801][802][803][804]”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chaiyaroj, S., Ngarmukos, T., & Lertsithichai, P.
Affiliations
Mahidol University (TH)
Corresponding author
Chaiyaroj, Suchart
Venue
Asian Cardiovascular and Thoracic Annals
Published
2008-08
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
292-297
ISSN
  • 0218-4923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1816-5370
OpenAlex
W2127230784
Cited by
22
References
18
Citations by year
2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Asian Cardiovascular and Thoracic Annals (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Keywords
sinus rhythm, radiofrequency ablation, mitral valve surgery, atrial fibrillation, left atrial diameter, prognostic factors, persistent atrial fibrillation, conversion to sinus rhythm, left atrial appendage
MeSH terms
Atrial Fibrillation, Electrocardiography, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Heart Rate, Heart Valve Diseases, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mitral Valve, Postoperative Period, Prognosis, Retrospective Studies, Time Factors, Catheter Ablation, Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review