Toward Visibility: Using the Swedish Gender-Inclusive Pronoun Hen Increases Gender Categorization of Androgynous Faces as Nonbinary
Open accessAbstract
Nonbinary people face invisibility and misrecognition. This research investigated how the use of the Swedish gender-inclusive neopronoun hen influenced the gender categorization of faces beyond the binary. In a between-subjects design, participants ( N = 368) were instructed to use the gender-inclusive neopronoun hen, the binary masculine pronoun han (he), or no pronoun in a writing task. Then, they categorized androgynous morphed faces by selecting one of four response options (“woman,” “man,” “nonbinary,” or “I don't know”). Altogether, the results indicated that few participants responded “I don't know,” indicating that categorizing gender by appearance is common. As expected, the use of the gender-inclusive pronoun increased nonbinary categorizations, whereas the use of the masculine pronoun did not increase man categorizations, documenting that gender-inclusive pronouns increase the visibility of nonbinary people. Gender binary beliefs were associated with less nonbinary categorization. The discussion outlines how these findings can inform social policymaking.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Both de-gendering and multi-gendering strategies can contribute to inclusion and visibility in language, which can benefit women, sexual minorities, transgender people, nonbinary and gender-nonconforming individuals.
“Both strategies can contribute to inclusion and visibility in language, which can benefit women, sexual minorities, transgender people, nonbinary and gender-nonconforming individuals (Klysing et al., 2022; van Berlekom et al., 2024).”
From A Sexist Language? Gender Differences in Attitudes and Use of Gender-Inclusive Pronouns (2025) · cites this paper as van Berlekom et al., 2024
Cites
Non-binary or genderqueer genders
Richards, C., Bouman, W. P., Seal, L., Barker, M. J., Nieder, T. O., & T’Sjoen, G. (2016) · International Review of Psychiatry · doi:10.3109/09540261.2015.1106446 · Cited by 782 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Sexist Language? Gender Differences in Attitudes and Use of Gender-Inclusive Pronouns
Remsö, A., Bäck, H., & Renström, E. A. (2025) · Journal of Language and Social Psychology · doi:10.1177/0261927x251335305 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“Both strategies can contribute to inclusion and visibility in language, which can bene fi t women, sexual minorities, transgender people, nonbinary and gender-nonconforming individuals (Klysing et al., 2022; van Berlekom et al., 2024).”
- Authors
- van Berlekom, E., Sczesny, S., & Sendén, M. G.
- Affiliations
- Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
- University of Bern (CH)
- Stockholm University (SE)
- Venue
- Journal of Language and Social Psychology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2024-10
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 5-6
- Pages
- 525-543
- ISSN
- 0261-927X (ISSN-L)
- 1552-6526
- OpenAlex
- W4403498897
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6
- FWCI
- 6.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Language and Social Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Ax:on Johnsson Foundation (F20-0502)
- Riksbankens Jubileumsfond (P16-0058:1)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Studies in Language
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Keywords
- gender-neutral pronouns, hens, non-binary people, gender categorization, face perception, Swedish language, morphed faces
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review