The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Precarity as a Political Concept, or, Fordism as Exception
Abstract
In 2003, the concept of precarity emerged as the central organizing platform for a series of social struggles that would spread across the space of Europe. Four years later, almost as suddenly as the precarity movement appeared, so it would enter into crisis. To understand precarity as a political concept it is necessary to go beyond economistic approaches that see social conditions as determined by the mode of production. Such a move requires us to see Fordism as exception and precarity as the norm. The political concept and practice of translation enables us to frame the precarity of creative labour in a broader historical and geographical perspective, shedding light on its contestation and relation to the concept of the common. Our interest is in the potential for novel forms of connection, subjectivization and political organization. Such processes of translation are themselves inherently precarious, transborder undertakings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Neoliberalism as Exception: Mutations in Citizenship and Sovereignty
Ong, A. (2006) · doi:10.1215/9780822387879 · Cited by 3,906
Wark, M. (2004) · doi:10.4159/9780674044845 · Cited by 288
Cited by
Redoing feminism: digital activism, body politics, and neoliberalism
Baer, H. (2016) · Feminist Media Studies · doi:10.1080/14680777.2015.1093070 · Cited by 462
Algorithmic Control in Platform Food Delivery Work
Griesbach, K., Reich, A., Elliott-Negri, L., & Milkman, R. (2019) · Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World · doi:10.1177/2378023119870041 · Cited by 443
The Precarious Present: Wageless Labor and Disrupted Life in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Millar, K. M. (2014) · Cultural Anthropology · doi:10.14506/ca29.1.04 · Cited by 375
Toward a critical politics of precarity
Millar, K. M. (2017) · Sociology Compass · doi:10.1111/soc4.12483 · Cited by 292
No funny business: Precarious work and emotional labour in stand-up comedy
Butler, N., & Stoyanova Russell, D. (2018) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726718758880 · Cited by 117
Metadata
- Authors
- Neilson, B., & Rossiter, N.
- Venue
- Theory, Culture & Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2008-12
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 7-8
- Pages
- 51-72
- ISSN
- 0263-2764 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-3616
- OpenAlex
- W2163682089
- Cited by
- 735
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 39.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Precarity as a Political Concept, or, Fordism as Exception. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0263276408097796
- The paper
- Neilson, B., & Rossiter, N. (2008). Precarity as a Political Concept, or, Fordism as Exception. Theory, Culture & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276408097796
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.