The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
What Is Energy For? Social Practice and Energy Demand
Open accessAbstract
Energy has an ambivalent status in social theory, variously figuring as a driver or an outcome of social and institutional change, or as something that is woven into the fabric of society itself. In this article the authors consider the underlying models on which different approaches depend. One common strategy is to view energy as a resource base, the management and organization of which depends on various intersecting systems: political, economic and technological. This is not the only route to take. The authors develop an alternative approach, viewing energy supply and energy demand as part of the ongoing reproduction of bundles and complexes of social practice. In articulating and comparing these two positions they show how social-theoretical commitments influence the ways in which problems like those of reducing carbon emissions are framed and addressed. Whereas theories of practice highlight basic questions about what energy is for, these issues are routinely and perhaps necessarily obscured by those who see energy as an abstract resource that structures or that is structured by a range of interlocking social systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Powers, C. H., & Giddens, A. (1988) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2579442 · Cited by 8,828
Geels, F. W. (2002) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(02)00062-8 · Cited by 7,275
The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory
(2005) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203977453 · Cited by 3,946
The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and How it Changes
Shove, E., Pantzar, M., & Watson, M. (2012) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781446250655 · Cited by 3,768
Self-citationShaping Technology, Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change.
Lynch, M., Bijker, W. E., & Law, J. (1993) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2074370 · Cited by 3,540
Consumption and Theories of Practice
Warde, A. (2005) · Journal of Consumer Culture · doi:10.1177/1469540505053090 · Cited by 2,682
The Site of the Social A Philosophical Account of the Constitution of Social Life and Change
Schatzki, T. R. (2002) · doi:10.1515/9780271023717 · Cited by 2,198
The practice turn in contemporary theory
Styhre, A. (2003) · Scandinavian Journal of Management · doi:10.1016/s0956-5221(03)00029-0 · Cited by 2,166
Social Practices: A Wittgensteinian Approach to Human Activity and the Social
Schatzki, T. R. (1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511527470 · Cited by 2,097
Social practices: a Wittgensteinian approach to human activity and the social
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.34-3809 · Cited by 1,793
Cited by
Carbon lock-in: types, causes, and policy implications
Seto, K. C., Davis, S. J., Mitchell, R. B., Stokes, E. C., Unruh, G., & Ürge-Vorsatz, D. (2016) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085934 · Cited by 1,346
Reducing energy demand: A review of issues, challenges and approaches
Sorrell, S. (2015) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.03.002 · Cited by 819
Social, Economic, and Environmental Impacts of Renewable Energy Resources
Kumar, M. (2020) · Wind Solar Hybrid Renewable Energy System · doi:10.5772/intechopen.89494 · Cited by 246
Wolsink, M. (2024) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2023.103392 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Shove, E., & Walker, G.
- Venue
- Theory, Culture & Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2014-07-01
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 41-58
- ISSN
- 0263-2764 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-3616
- OpenAlex
- W2162519804
- Cited by
- 710
- References
- 37
- FWCI
- 35.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What Is Energy For? Social Practice and Energy Demand. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0263276414536746
- The paper
- Shove, E., & Walker, G. (2014). What Is Energy For? Social Practice and Energy Demand. Theory, Culture & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276414536746
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.