Cited by 512Ethics and Social Impacts of AICultural Studies and PostmodernismPolitical Economy and Marxism

Data colonialism through accumulation by dispossession: New metaphors for daily data

Open access
Thatcher, Jim, O’Sullivan, David, Mahmoudi, Dillon·2016·Environment and Planning D: Society and Space

Abstract

In recent years, much has been written on ‘big data’ in both the popular and academic press. After the hubristic declaration of the ‘end of theory’ more nuanced arguments have emerged, suggesting that increasingly pervasive data collection and quantification may have significant implications for the social sciences, even if the social, scientific, political, and economic agendas behind big data are less new than they are often portrayed. Compared to the boosterish tone of much of its press, academic critiques of big data have been relatively muted, often focusing on the continued importance of more traditional forms of domain knowledge and expertise. Indeed, many academic responses to big data enthusiastically celebrate the availability of new data sources and the potential for new insights and perspectives they may enable. Undermining many of these critiques is a lack of attention to the role of technology in society, particularly with respect to the labor process, the continued extension of labor relations into previously private times and places, and the commoditization of more and more aspects of everyday life. In this article, we parse a variety of big data definitions to argue that it is only when individual datums by the million, billion, or more are linked together algorithmically that ‘big data’ emerges as a commodity. Such decisions do not occur in a vacuum but as part of an asymmetric power relationship in which individuals are dispossessed of the data they generat…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0263775816633195

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Preventing people from accessing their personal data through accumulation by dispossession parallels the primitive accumulation of land enclosure movements that separated producers from the means of production.

    “preventing people from accessing their personal data through processes of accumulation by dispossession (Harvey 2003) parallels the primitive accumulation of the land enclosure movements that separated the producers from the means of production”

    From Social Injustice in Surveillance Capitalism (2017) · cites this paper as Thatcher et al. 2016

  • The economic value of personal data is largely realized in aggregate patterns and future potential that become visible when data points are linked together through data analytics and algorithmic processing.

    “the economic value of personal data is largely realized in the aggregate-patterns and future potential become visible when data points are linked together through data analytics and algorithmic processing (Thatcher et al. 2016).”

    From Social Injustice in Surveillance Capitalism (2017) · cites this paper as Thatcher et al. 2016

  • Data about one individual's actions or properties at one moment needs to be combined with data about other actions, moments, and properties to generate valuable relations between data points.

    “second, data about one individual's actions or properties at one moment needs to be combined with data about other actions, moments, and properties to generate valuable relations between data points (Arvidsson 2016;Thatcher et al. 2016, 995).”

    From Data colonialism: rethinking big data’s relation to the contemporary subject (2019) · cites this paper as Thatcher et al. 2016

  • Data appropriation is a form of fundamental appropriation of resource or extraction.

    “More helpful are approaches which see what is going on with data as a form of fundamental appropriation of resource (Greene and Joseph 2015;Thatcher et al. 2016, drawing on Harvey 2004) or extraction (Mezzadra and Neilson 2017).”

    From Data colonialism: rethinking big data’s relation to the contemporary subject (2019) · cites this paper as Thatcher et al. 2016

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thatcher, J., O’Sullivan, D., & Mahmoudi, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington Tacoma (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Portland State University (US)
Corresponding author
Thatcher, Jim
Venue
Environment and Planning D: Society and Space
Published
2016-07-26
Volume
34
Issue
6
Pages
990-1006
ISSN
  • 0263-7758 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-3433
OpenAlex
W2298562067
Cited by
512
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 49 · 2025: 68 · 2024: 69 · 2023: 68 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 75 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6
FWCI
64.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environment and Planning D Society and Space (publishedVersion)
  • University of Washington Tacoma Digital Commons (University of Washington Tacoma) (submittedVersion)
  • PDXScholar (Portland State University) (submittedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Maryland Shared Open Access Repository (USMAI Consortium) (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Repository at the University of Maryland (University of Maryland College Park)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Cultural Studies and Postmodernism
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Economy and Marxism
Keywords
data colonialism, accumulation by dispossession, big data, commodification of everyday life, data commodification, power imbalance, everyday life

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review