Cited by 105Assistive Technology in Communication and MobilityTactile and Sensory InteractionsDigital Accessibility for Disabilities

Indoor navigation by blind people: behaviors and challenges in unfamiliar spaces and buildings

Jeamwatthanachai, Watthanasak, Wald, Mike, Wills, Gary·2019·British Journal of Visual Impairment

Abstract

A number of visually impaired people suffer from navigation-related activities due to mishaps that discourage them from going out for social activities and interactions. In contrast to outdoors, traveling inside public spaces is a different story, as many environmental cues cannot be used and have their own set of difficulties. Some technologies have come into play in helping these people to have freedom in navigation (e.g., accessible map, indoor navigation systems, and wearable computing devices). However, technologies like accessible maps or indoor navigation systems are insufficient to fulfill the independent navigation gap as additional information is required (obstacles, barriers, and accessibility). To promote indoor navigation and create better use of technologies for visually impaired people, it is essential to understand the facts and actual problems that they experience, and what behaviors and strategies they use to overcome any problems; these are the concerns that led to this study. In all, 30 visually impaired people and 15 experts were recruited to give an interview about the behavior and strategies used to navigate indoor spaces, especially public spaces, for example, universities, hospitals, malls, museums, and airports. The findings from this study reveal that navigating inside buildings and public spaces full of unfamiliar features is too difficult to attempt the first time for a number of reasons, reducing their confidence in independent navigation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0264619619833723

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jeamwatthanachai, W., Wald, M., & Wills, G.
Affiliations
University of Southampton (GB)
Corresponding author
Jeamwatthanachai, Watthanasak
Venue
British Journal of Visual Impairment
Published
2019-05
Volume
37
Issue
2
Pages
140-153
ISSN
  • 0264-6196 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-5809
OpenAlex
W2907507865
Cited by
105
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1
FWCI
18.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • British Journal of Visual Impairment (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
Keywords
indoor navigation, visually impaired people, blind people, independent navigation, navigation strategies, public space, buildings, accessibility, barriers, assistive technology, wearable computing, accessible maps

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review