The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
‘Feeling Caught’ in Stepfamilies: Managing Boundary Turbulence through Appropriate Communication Privacy Rules
Abstract
This study used a Communication Privacy Management perspective to examine the communication patterns that foster and ameliorate triangulation in stepfamilies. The qualitative analysis of 90 in-depth interviews with stepchildren, stepparents, and parents from 30 stepfamilies revealed that enmeshed communication boundaries contributed to children feeling caught between their custodial and noncustodial parents and parents and/or stepparents feeling caught between the children in the stepfamily. The dialectical tensions of loyalty–disloyalty and revealment–concealment that comprised stepfamily members’ feelings of being caught produced turbulence in their previously established communication rules. The stepfamilies responded to these tensions with boundary coordination or boundary separation. The ways the boundaries became enmeshed and the management attempts used to coordinate new boundary rules are outlined.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions
Fleiss, J. L., Levin, B., & Paik, M. C. (2003) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471445428 · Cited by 18,646
Phenomenological research methods
Moustakas, C. (1994) · doi:10.4135/9781412995658 · Cited by 13,919
The Consequences of Divorce for Adults and Children
Amato, P. R. (2000) · Journal of Marriage and Family · doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.01269.x · Cited by 2,931
Parental Divorce, Marital Conflict, and Offspring Well-being during Early Adulthood
Amato, P. R., Loomis, L. S., & Booth, A. (1995) · Social Forces · doi:10.1093/sf/73.3.895 · Cited by 548
Emotional Transmission in the Daily Lives of Families: A New Paradigm for Studying Family Process
Larson, R. W., & Almeida, D. M. (1999) · Journal of Marriage and the Family · doi:10.2307/353879 · Cited by 467
Cited by
Toward a Theory of Motivated Information Management
Afifi, W. A., & Weiner, J. L. (2004) · Communication Theory · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00310.x · Cited by 683
Communication Privacy Management Theory: What Do We Know About Family Privacy Regulation?
Petronio, S. (2010) · Journal of Family Theory & Review · doi:10.1111/j.1756-2589.2010.00052.x · Cited by 397
Feeling Caught Between Parents: Adult Children's Relations With Parents and Subjective Well‐Being
Amato, P. R., & Afifi, T. D. (2006) · Journal of Marriage and Family · doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00243.x · Cited by 374
Self-citationBrief Status Report on Communication Privacy Management Theory
Petronio, S. (2013) · Journal of Family Communication · doi:10.1080/15267431.2013.743426 · Cited by 277
Metadata
- Authors
- Afifi, T. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Social and Personal Relationships
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2003-12
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 729-755
- ISSN
- 0265-4075 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-3608
- OpenAlex
- W2139593765
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 16.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ‘Feeling Caught’ in Stepfamilies: Managing Boundary Turbulence through Appropriate Communication Privacy Rules. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0265407503206002
- The paper
- Afifi, T. D. (2003). ‘Feeling Caught’ in Stepfamilies: Managing Boundary Turbulence through Appropriate Communication Privacy Rules. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407503206002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.