The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Consequences of relationship status and quality for subjective well-being
Abstract
This study examined the links among relationship status, relationship happiness, and a latent measure of subjective well-being. Using the study of Marital Instability over the Life Course, we found that married individuals reported the highest level of subjective well-being, followed (in order) by individuals in cohabiting relationships, steady dating relationships, casual dating relationships, and individuals who dated infrequently or not at all. Individuals in happy relationships reported a higher level of subjective well-being than did individuals in unhappy relationships, irrespective of relationship status. Even with relationship happiness controlled, however, relationship status was associated with subjective well-being. A longitudinal analysis suggested that shifting into more committed relationships was followed by improvements in subjective well-being. Little support was found for the assumption that people with a high level of well-being select themselves into more committed relationships.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Society and the Adolescent Self-Image
Rosenberg, M. (1965) · doi:10.1515/9781400876136 · Cited by 30,126
Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being.
Ryff, C. D. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069 · Cited by 14,847
Well-being : the foundations of hedonic psychology
Kahneman, D. J., Diener, E. F., & Schwarz, N. (1999) · Cited by 7,466
The Structure of Psychological Well-Being.
Mechanic, D., & Bradburn, N. M. (1970) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2093340 · Cited by 4,923
The Past, Present, and Future of an Identity Theory
Stryker, S., & Burke, P. J. (2000) · Social Psychology Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2695840 · Cited by 3,936
Optimizing well-being: The empirical encounter of two traditions.
Keyes, C. L. M., Shmotkin, D., & Ryff, C. D. (2002) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.1007 · Cited by 3,322 · cited 2×
“The second tradition, which focuses on psychological well-being, grew out of formulations of adult development and personal growth (Keyes et al., 2002).”
Structures and Processes of Social Support
House, J. S., Umberson, D., & Landis, K. R. (1988) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.so.14.080188.001453 · Cited by 2,022
The Quality of American Life: Perceptions, Evaluations, and Satisfactions.
Boguslaw, R., Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. L. (1977) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2577440 · Cited by 1,947
Young, K. (2016) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315008189 · Cited by 1,589
Bernard, J. S. (1972) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,063
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Arbuckle, J. L., 1997, Amos User’s Guide, Version 3.6
- Booth, A., 1998, Marital instability over the life course: Methodology report for fifth wave
Cited by
Loneliness Across the Life Span
Qualter, P., Vanhalst, J., Harris, R., Van Roekel, E., Lodder, G., Bangee, M., Maes, M., & Verhagen, M. (2015) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691615568999 · Cited by 1,080
Interpersonal emotion regulation as a mechanism of social support in depression
Marroquín, B. (2011) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2011.09.005 · Cited by 414
Mental health of healthcare workers during the COVID‐19 pandemic in Italy
Di Tella, M., Romeo, A., Benfante, A., & Castelli, L. (2020) · Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/jep.13444 · Cited by 404
Religion, Health, and Psychological Well-Being
Green, M., & Elliott, M. (2010) · Journal of Religion and Health · doi:10.1007/s10943-009-9242-1 · Cited by 329
Well-Being and Romantic Relationships: A Systematic Review in Adolescence and Emerging Adulthood
Gómez-López, M., Viejo, C., & Ortega-Ruiz, R. (2019) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph16132415 · Cited by 462
Metadata
- Authors
- Dush, C. M. K., & Amato, P. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Social and Personal Relationships
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2005-10
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 607-627
- ISSN
- 0265-4075 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-3608
- OpenAlex
- W2109531604
- Cited by
- 698
- References
- 36
- FWCI
- 7.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Consequences of relationship status and quality for subjective well-being. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0265407505056438
- The paper
- Dush, C. M. K., & Amato, P. R. (2005). Consequences of relationship status and quality for subjective well-being. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407505056438
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
