Cited by 47Attachment and Relationship DynamicsNostalgia and Consumer BehaviorDeath Anxiety and Social Exclusion

The effects of nostalgia and avoidant attachment on relationship satisfaction and romantic motives

Juhl, Jacob, Sand, Elizabeth C., Routledge, Clay·2012·Journal of Social and Personal Relationships

Abstract

The current research tested whether attachment-related avoidance interacts with nostalgia to predict individuals’ orientation towards romantic relationships. In Study 1, participants were in a relationship, and in Study 2, participants were single. In both studies, attachment-related avoidance and anxiety were measured and participants were assigned to a nostalgia or control induction. Subsequently, participants indicated their relationship satisfaction (Study 1) or desire to pursue a romantic relationship (Study 2). Results revealed that there was a negative relationship between attachment-related avoidance and high levels of relationship satisfaction (Study 1) and relationship desire (Study 2) in the nostalgia condition, but not in the control condition. These findings build upon previous research on attachment and nostalgia to suggest that attachment-related avoidance greatly influences how nostalgia affects romantic relationship-oriented outcomes. Nostalgia appears to orient low avoidant individuals towards relationships and high avoidant individuals away from relationships.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0265407512443433

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Nostalgia rendered low-avoidance persons more satisfied with their relationships.

    “Nostalgia rendered low-avoidance persons more satisfied with their relationships and more desirous of a relationship.”

    From To Nostalgize (2015) · cites this paper as Juhl, Sand, and Routledge (2012)

  • Nostalgia rendered low-avoidance persons more desirous of a relationship.

    “Nostalgia rendered low-avoidance persons more satisfied with their relationships and more desirous of a relationship.”

    From To Nostalgize (2015) · cites this paper as Juhl, Sand, and Routledge (2012)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Juhl, J., Sand, E. C., & Routledge, C.
Affiliations
North Dakota State University (US)
Corresponding author
Juhl, Jacob
Venue
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships
Published
2012-04-18
Volume
29
Issue
5
Pages
661-670
ISSN
  • 0265-4075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-3608
OpenAlex
W2151663276
Cited by
47
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Social and Personal Relationships (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Nostalgia and Consumer Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Keywords
nostalgia, attachment avoidance, attachment anxiety, relationship satisfaction, romantic relationships, attachment styles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review