The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sexual Satisfaction within Dating Relationships: A Test of the Interpersonal Exchange Model of Sexual Satisfaction
Abstract
This study extended the Interpersonal Exchange Model of Sexual Satisfaction (IEMSS) to short-term dating relationships. The IEMSS has been shown to have excellent validity for long-term heterosexual relationships. The IEMSS proposes that sexual satisfaction is greater to the extent that, over time, relationship satisfaction is high, levels of sexual rewards exceed levels of sexual costs, relative sexual reward levels exceed relative sexual cost levels, and interpersonal equality of sexual rewards and of sexual costs are perceived to exist. Fifty-one college men and 57 college women in a dating relationship of 3 to 36 months participated in the study. As predicted, more sexually satisfied individuals reported greater relationship satisfaction, a more favorable reward/cost ratio, a more favorable relative reward/relative cost ratio, and more equal rewards and costs between partners. Hierarchical regression analysis indicated that relationship satisfaction, the difference between relative rewards, relative costs and cost equality made unique contributions to the prediction of sexual satisfaction, accounting for 75 percent of the variance in sexual satisfaction. The model was shown to work equally well for men and women, for individuals new and less new to their relationship, and for high and low self-disclosers. The IEMSS offers a promising approach for investigating and understanding sexual satisfaction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sexual satisfaction and sexual self‐disclosure within dating relationships
Byers, E. S., & Demmons, S. (1999) · Journal of Sex Research · doi:10.1080/00224499909551983 · Cited by 277
Self-citationThe association between daily stress and sexual activity.
Bodenmann, G., Atkins, D. C., Schär, M., & Poffet, V. (2010) · Journal of Family Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0019365 · Cited by 179
Alexithymia and satisfaction in intimate relationships
Humphreys, T. P., Wood, L. M., & Parker, J. D. A. (2009) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.09.002 · Cited by 130
Milhausen, R. R., Buchholz, A. C., Opperman, E. A., & Benson, L. E. (2015) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-014-0328-9 · Cited by 105
The Effects of Mindfulness on Sexual Outcomes: The Role of Emotion Regulation.
Pepping, C. A., Cronin, T. J., Lyons, A., & Caldwell, J. G. (2018) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-017-1127-x · Cited by 86
Metadata
- Authors
- Byers, E. S., Demmons, S., & Lawrance, K.-A.
- Venue
- Journal of Social and Personal Relationships
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1998-04
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 257-267
- ISSN
- 0265-4075 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-3608
- OpenAlex
- W2104624002
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sexual Satisfaction within Dating Relationships: A Test of the Interpersonal Exchange Model of Sexual Satisfaction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0265407598152008
- The paper
- Byers, E. S., Demmons, S., & Lawrance, K.-A. (1998). Sexual Satisfaction within Dating Relationships: A Test of the Interpersonal Exchange Model of Sexual Satisfaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407598152008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.