Cited by 179Sexual function and dysfunction studiesAttachment and Relationship DynamicsMarriage and Sexual Relationships

The association between daily stress and sexual activity.

Open access
Bodenmann, Guy, Atkins, David C., Schär, Marcel, Poffet, Valérie·2010·Journal of Family Psychology

Abstract

Research has shown that stressors and experienced stress are negatively correlated with sexual activity (i.e., behavior and satisfaction) within couples. Thus far, most studies have been cross-sectional and report correlations only. This study is one of the first to examine the covariation between self-perceived stress and daily sexual activity within a time period of 3 months by collecting data on stress, sexual activity, sexual satisfaction, and sexual fulfillment as well as individual and dyadic coping. The association among these variables was tested in a multilevel model that included cyclical terms to capture the regular variation of sexual behavior over the days of the week. One hundred and three female students completed questionnaires and diaries 12 times during a 3-month period just prior to a major exam. Findings suggest that higher self-reported stress in daily life was associated with lower levels of sexual activity and satisfaction and a decrease in relationship satisfaction. In addition, dyadic coping was positively associated with sexual outcomes but did not moderate the association of experienced stress and sexuality. Implications for sexuality research in close relationships and methods for studying cyclical processes are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0019365

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bodenmann, G., Atkins, D. C., Schär, M., & Poffet, V.
Affiliations
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • University of Washington (US)
Venue
Journal of Family Psychology
Published
2010
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
271-279
ISSN
  • 0893-3200 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1293
OpenAlex
W2059788616
Cited by
179
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Journal of Family Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zürcher Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften digital collection (Zurich University of Applied Sciences) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Marriage and Sexual Relationships
Keywords
daily stress, sexual activity, sexual satisfaction, relationship satisfaction, dyadic coping, individual coping, close relationships, female students, exam stress, diaries
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Middle Aged, Personal Satisfaction, Psychological Tests, Sexual Behavior, Stress, Psychological, Confidence Intervals, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review