Cited by 105Eating Disorders and BehaviorsSexual function and dysfunction studiesBody Image and Dysmorphia Studies

Relationships Between Body Image, Body Composition, Sexual Functioning, and Sexual Satisfaction Among Heterosexual Young Adults

Milhausen, Robin R., Buchholz, Andrea C., Opperman, Emily A., Benson, Lindsay E.·2015·Archives of Sexual Behavior

Abstract

This study investigated the association between body image and body-image self-consciousness on sexual satisfaction, accounting for relationships between body fat and body image, and between sexual functioning and sexual satisfaction, while controlling for relationship satisfaction. Participants were 143, 18-25 year-old Caucasian men and women in heterosexual monogamous relationships, recruited from the University of Guelph and surrounding community in Ontario, Canada. Various domains of body image, body-image self-consciousness, sexual satisfaction and functioning, and relationship satisfaction data were collected by questionnaires. Body fat was measured using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Among men, body image was positively associated with sexual satisfaction, after controlling for relationship satisfaction. Men with greater body fat were more likely to have poorer behavioral and affective body image. Only body image specific to the sexual encounter influenced sexual functioning. Among women, no domain of body image was associated with sexual satisfaction, after controlling for relationship satisfaction. Women with greater body fat were more likely to have poorer affective and sexual-encounter-specific body image. As percent total fat increased, sexual functioning decreased. Our results suggest a complex pattern of relationships exists among body image and body composition constructs and sexual and relationship variable; and that these relationships are not the same for men and women.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10508-014-0328-9

Cites

93 of 93 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Milhausen, R. R., Buchholz, A. C., Opperman, E. A., & Benson, L. E.
Affiliations
University of Guelph (CA)
Corresponding author
Buchholz, Andrea C.
Venue
Archives of Sexual Behavior
Published
2014-07-26
Volume
44
Issue
6
Pages
1621-1633
ISSN
  • 0004-0002 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2800
OpenAlex
W2055894805
Cited by
105
References
93
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1
FWCI
7.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Sexual Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
Keywords
body image, sexual satisfaction, sexual function, fat mass, body composition, relationship satisfaction, heterosexual young adults, gender differences
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Body Composition, Body Image, Female, Humans, Male, Ontario, Personal Satisfaction, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Concept, Heterosexuality, White People, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review