The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Grammatical gender in adult L2 acquisition: Relations between lexical and syntactic variability
Abstract
In order to identify the causes of inflectional variability in adult second-language (L2) acquisition, this study investigates lexical and syntactic aspects of gender processing in real-time L2 production and comprehension. Twenty advanced to near-native adult first language (L1) English speakers of L2 German and 20 native controls were tested in a study comprising two experiments. In elicited production, we probe accuracy in lexical gender assignment. In a visual-world eye tracking task, we test the predictive processing of syntactic gender agreement between determiners and nouns. The findings show clear contingencies (1) between overall accuracy in lexical gender assignment in production and target predictive processing of syntactic gender agreement in comprehension and (2) between the speed of lexical access and predictive syntactic gender agreement. These findings support lexical and computational accounts of L2 inflectional variability and argue against models positing representational deficits in morphosyntax in late L2 acquisition and processing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Allopenna, P. D., Magnuson, J. S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1998) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1006/jmla.1997.2558 · Cited by 1,604
Corbett, G. G. (1991) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139166119 · Cited by 1,385
Prévost, P., & White, L. (2000) · Second Language Research · doi:10.1191/026765800677556046 · Cited by 864
Using the visual world paradigm to study language processing: A review and critical evaluation
Huettig, F., Rommers, J., & Meyer, A. S. (2011) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.11.003 · Cited by 654
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition
MAHOMOUDİ, F., & MAHMOUDİ, A. (2020) · Turkish Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.51242/saka-tjer.2020.3 · Cited by 568
Montrul, S., Foote, R., & Perpiñán, S. (2008) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2008.00449.x · Cited by 516
McDonald, J. L. (2006) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2006.06.006 · Cited by 484
Semantic and letter fluency in Spanish-English bilinguals.
Gollan, T. H., Montoya, R. I., & Werner, G. A. (2002) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037/0894-4105.16.4.562 · Cited by 458
Young Children Learning Spanish Make Rapid Use of Grammatical Gender in Spoken Word Recognition
Lew-Williams, C., & Fernald, A. (2007) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01871.x · Cited by 441
Tokowicz, N., & MacWhinney, B. (2005) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263105050102 · Cited by 419
Cited by
The role of language processing in language acquisition
Phillips, C., & Ehrenhofer, L. (2015) · Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism · doi:10.1075/lab.5.4.01phi · Cited by 123
Rossi, E., Diaz, M., Kroll, J. F., & Dussias, P. E. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00342 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Hopp, H.
- Venue
- Second Language Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2013-01
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 33-56
- ISSN
- 0165-9960 (ISSN-L)
- 0267-6583
- 1477-0326
- OpenAlex
- W2145093990
- Cited by
- 331
- References
- 48
- FWCI
- 10.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Grammatical gender in adult L2 acquisition: Relations between lexical and syntactic variability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0267658312461803
- The paper
- Hopp, H. (2013). Grammatical gender in adult L2 acquisition: Relations between lexical and syntactic variability. Second Language Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658312461803
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.