The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prehabilitation and early rehabilitation after spinal surgery: randomized clinical trial
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the outcome after spinal surgery when adding prehabilitation to the early rehabilitation. Design: A randomized clinical study. Setting: Orthopaedic surgery department. Subject: Sixty patients scheduled for surgery followed by inpatient rehabilitation for degenerative lumbar disease. Interventions: The patients were computer randomized to prehabilitation and early rehabilitation (28 patients) or to standard care exclusively (32 patients). The intervention began two months prior to the operation. The prehabilitation included an intensive exercise programme and optimization of the analgesic treatment. Protein drinks were given the day before surgery. The early postoperative rehabilitation included balanced pain therapy with self-administered epidural analgesia, doubled intensified mobilization and protein supplements. Main measures: The outcome measurements were postoperative stay, complications, functionality, pain and satisfaction. Results: At operation the intervention group had improved function, assessed by Roland Morris Questionnaire (P = 0.001). After surgery the intervention group reached the recovery milestones faster than the control group (1—6 days versus 3—13, P =0.001), and left hospital earlier (5 (3—9) versus 7 (5—15) days, P =0.007). There was no difference in postoperative complications, adverse events, low back pain and radiating pain, timed up and go, sit-to-stand or in life quality. Patient satisfaction was significantly higher in the intervention group compared with the control group. Conclusion: The integrated programme of prehabilitation and early rehabilitation improved the outcome and shortened the hospital stay — without more complications, pain or dissatisfaction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Study of the Natural History of Back Pain: Part I
ROLAND, M., & MORRIS, R. (1983) · Spine · doi:10.1097/00007632-198303000-00004 · Cited by 3,395
Preoperative prediction of severe postoperative pain
Kalkman, J. C., Visser, K., Moen, J., Bonsel, J. G., Grobbee, E. D., & Moons, M. K. G. (2003) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(03)00252-5 · Cited by 616
Controversy in Counting and Attributing Events in Clinical Trials
Sackett, D. L., & Gent, M. (1979) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm197912273012602 · Cited by 413
The Norwegian Brief Pain Inventory Questionnaire
Klepstad, P., Loge, J. H., Borchgrevink, P. C., Mendoza, T. R., Cleeland, C. S., & Kaasa, S. (2002) · Journal of Pain and Symptom Management · doi:10.1016/s0885-3924(02)00526-2 · Cited by 313
Brox, J. I., Reikerås, O., Nygaard, Y., Srensen, R., Indahl, A., Holm, I., Keller, A., Ingebrigtsen, T., Grundnes, O., Lange, J. E., et al. (2006) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2006.01.027 · Cited by 296
An approach to measuring and valuing health states
Sintonen, H. (1981) · Social Science & Medicine. Part C: Medical Economics · doi:10.1016/0160-7995(81)90019-8 · Cited by 104
Cited by
Systematic review and meta-analysis of enhanced recovery programmes in surgical patients
Nicholson, A., Lowe, M. C., Parker, J., Lewis, S. R., Alderson, P., & Smith, A. F. (2014) · British Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.9394 · Cited by 476
Debono, B., Wainwright, T. W., Wang, M. Y., Sigmundsson, F. G., Yang, M. M. H., Smid-Nanninga, H., Bonnal, A., Le Huec, J.-C., Fawcett, W. J., Ljungqvist, O., et al. (2021) · The Spine Journal · doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2021.01.001 · Cited by 444
Hughes, C. G., Boncyk, C. S., Culley, D. J., Fleisher, L. A., Leung, J. M., McDonagh, D. L., Gan, T. J., McEvoy, M. D., Miller, T. E., & Workgroup, F. T. P. Q. I. (. 6. (2020) · Anesthesia & Analgesia · doi:10.1213/ane.0000000000004641 · Cited by 391
Preoperative Assessment of the Older Patient: A Narrative Review
Oresanya, L. B., Lyons, W. L., & Finlayson, E. (2014) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2014.4573 · Cited by 344
Prehabilitation for Patients Undergoing Orthopedic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Punnoose, A., Claydon-Mueller, L. S., Weiss, O., Zhang, J., Rushton, A., & Khanduja, V. (2023) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.8050 · Cited by 219
Metadata
- Authors
- Nielsen, P. R., Jørgensen, L. D., Dahl, B., Pedersen, T., & Tønnesen, H.
- Venue
- Clinical Rehabilitation
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2010-01-26
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 137-148
- ISSN
- 0269-2155 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-0873
- OpenAlex
- W2132102003
- Cited by
- 271
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 9.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prehabilitation and early rehabilitation after spinal surgery: randomized clinical trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0269215509347432
- The paper
- Nielsen, P. R., Jørgensen, L. D., Dahl, B., Pedersen, T., & Tønnesen, H. (2010). Prehabilitation and early rehabilitation after spinal surgery: randomized clinical trial. Clinical Rehabilitation. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215509347432
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.