Cited by 32Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationMyofascial pain diagnosis and treatmentAutomotive and Human Injury Biomechanics

Is surface EMG biofeedback an effective training method for persons with neck and shoulder complaints after whiplash-associated disorders concerning activities of daily living and pain - a randomized controlled trial

Ehrenborg, Cecilia, Archenholtz, Birgitha·2010·Clinical Rehabilitation

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of surface electromyographic (EMG) biofeedback training as a supplement to an interdisciplinary rehabilitation programme regarding consequences for activities of daily living and pain. Design A randomized controlled unblinded trial. Settings The study was carried out in a pain unit at a rehabilitation centre. Subjects Sixty-five people with chronic whiplash-associated disorders consecutively referred to the pain unit agreed to participate in the study. Participants were randomly assigned to either the treatment or control group. Intervention All participants received interdisciplinary rehabilitation and the treatment group also had four weeks of surface EMG biofeedback training. Main measures The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure was used at admission discharge and at six-month follow-up to register changes in activities of daily living. The Multidimensional Pain Inventory, Swedish version, was used at admission and at six-month follow-up to capture the multidimensional aspects of pain. Results Sixty-two people completed the study. Both treatment and control groups improved significantly according to the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure at discharge and the results remained after six months (P Conclusion In this study there was no support for the effectiveness of surface EMG biofeedback training as a supplement to an interdisciplinary rehabilitation programme for people with long-lasting pain after whiplash.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0269215510362325

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The authors excluded four trials from the previous review because they were equivalence trials with no control arm or compared two psychological therapies to each other without adequate control, and four further trials because they were not primary psychological interventions.

    “We excluded four trials from the previous review because they were equivalence trials with no control arm or compared two psychological therapies to each other, without adequate control (Ehrenborg 2010; Leeuw 2008; Jensen 1997; Wetherell 2011) and four further trials because they were not primary psychological interventions (Falcao 2008; Hammond 2001; McCarberg 1999, Schmidt 2011).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ehrenborg, C., & Archenholtz, B.
Affiliations
  • Södra Älvsborg Hospital (SE)
  • Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE)
Corresponding author
Ehrenborg, Cecilia
Venue
Clinical Rehabilitation
Published
2010-06-18
Volume
24
Issue
8
Pages
715-726
ISSN
  • 0269-2155 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-0873
OpenAlex
W2151008406
Cited by
32
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
Keywords
surface electromyography biofeedback, whiplash-associated disorders, neck and shoulder pain, interdisciplinary rehabilitation, activities of daily living, pain interference, chronic whiplash, Canadian Occupational Performance Measure, Multidimensional Pain Inventory
MeSH terms
Shoulder Injuries, Activities of Daily Living, Adolescent, Adult, Biofeedback, Psychology, Electromyography, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain, Whiplash Injuries, Treatment Outcome, Neck Injuries, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review