Cited by 95Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesPalliative and Oncologic CareCOVID-19 and healthcare impacts

Health and social care professionals’ experiences of providing end of life care during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study

Open access
Hanna, Jeffrey R., Rapa, Elizabeth, Dalton, Louise J, Hughes, Rosemary, Quarmby, Louise M, McGlinchey, Tamsin, Donnellan, Warren J, Bennett, Kate M +2 more·2021·Palliative Medicine

Abstract

Background: Health and social care professionals’ ability to address the needs of patients and their relatives at end of life is likely to have been impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Aim: To explore health and social care professionals’ experiences of providing end of life care during the COVID-19 pandemic to help inform current/future clinical practice and policy. Design: A qualitative interview study. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. Setting/participants: Sixteen health and social care professionals working across a range of clinical settings in supporting dying patients during the first wave (March–June 2020) of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom. Results: Participants reported emotional and practical challenges to providing end of life care during the pandemic, including increases in patient numbers, reduced staffing levels and relying on virtual platforms for sensitive, emotive conversations with relatives. Participants were central to promoting connections between patients and their families at end of life and creating opportunities for a final contact before the death. However, the provision of support varied as a consequence of the pressures of the pandemic. Results are discussed under two themes: (1) challenges and facilitators to providing end of life care, and (2) support needs of relatives when a family member was dying during the COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusion: There is a need for flexible visiting arrangements at end of life during a pandemic. A systems-level approach is necessary to promote the wellbeing of health and social care professionals providing end of life care during and after a pandemic.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/02692163211017808

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The COVID-19 pandemic led to increased stress, distress, and burnout across the health and social care workforce, including palliative care.

    “The COVID-19 pandemic led to increased stress, distress, and burnout across the health and social care workforce,9–12 including palliative care13–16 and exacerbated the need for healthcare staff support internationally.13–17”

    From Feasibility of RESTORE: An online Acceptance and Commitment Therapy intervention to improve palliative care staff wellbeing. (2023) · cites this paper as [16]

    The Results and Discussion describe emotional strain, fatigue and challenges to well-being among professionals providing end-of-life care during COVID-19; the Conclusion recommends access to psychological support. The study does not establish increased burnout or findings across the entire health and social care workforce internationally. Page numbers were not provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hanna, J. R., Rapa, E., Dalton, L. J., Hughes, R., Quarmby, L. M., McGlinchey, T., Donnellan, W. J., Bennett, K. M., Mayland, C. R., & Mason, S. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • University of Liverpool (GB)
  • Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Hanna, Jeffrey R.
Venue
Palliative Medicine
Published
2021-05-18
Volume
35
Issue
7
Pages
1249-1257
ISSN
  • 0269-2163 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-030X
OpenAlex
W3162037687
Cited by
95
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 6
FWCI
17.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Palliative Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • Ulster University Research Portal (Ulster University) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde) (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
University of Oxford
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
Keywords
end-of-life care, COVID-19 pandemic, health and social care professionals, professional experience, employee well-being, family support, relatives of dying patients, virtual communication, labor shortage, palliative care
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, United Kingdom, Health Personnel, Humans, Social Support, Terminal Care, Qualitative Research, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review