Cited by 20Ethics in medical practicePalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesPalliative and Oncologic Care

Moral distress amongst palliative care doctors working during the COVID-19 pandemic: A narrative-focussed interview study

Open access
Fish, Ellis C., Lloyd, Anna·2022·Palliative Medicine

Abstract

Background: Palliative care professionals have had to adapt to rapidly changing COVID-19 restrictions with personal protective equipment and physical distancing measures impacting face-to-face communication with patients and relatives. Aim: To explore the narratives of palliative care doctors working during the pandemic to understand their experiences at a personal and professional level. Design: In-depth narrative interviews were carried out via video call. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using a joint paradigmatic and narrative approach to elucidate common themes and closely explore individual narratives. Setting/participants: Eight palliative care doctors who had worked on a hospice inpatient unit in the UK before and during the pandemic were recruited from two hospices in Scotland. Results: Three intersecting themes are described, the most significant being moral distress. Participants articulated a struggle to reconcile their moral convictions with the restrictions enforced, for example, wanting to provide support to patients through physical proximity but being unable to. To differing degrees, this resulted in internal conflict and emotional distress. Two further themes arose: the first concerned a loss of humanity in interaction and a striving to re-humanise communication through alternative means; the second being a change in staff morale as the pandemic progressed. Conclusions: Restrictions had a considerable impact on palliative care doctors’ ability to communicate with and comfort patients which led to moral distress and contributed to decreasing morale. Future research could explore moral distress in palliative care settings internationally during the pandemic with a view to compare the factors affecting how moral distress was experienced.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/02692163221088930

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Staff caring for people with an advanced progressive illness are at risk of stress, distress and burnout.

    “Staff caring for people with an advanced progressive illness are at risk of stress, distress and burnout.”

    From Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) for people with advanced progressive illness, their caregivers and staff involved in their care: A scoping review. (2023) · cites this paper as [17]

    The Introduction reports anxiety and psychological distress among palliative-care workers during COVID-19. The Discussion sections on moral distress and mental wellbeing describe doctors’ vulnerability to stress and a risk of professional burnout. The claim extends these pandemic-specific findings about palliative-care workers, particularly doctors, to staff caring for people with advanced progressive illness generally. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [11]Silverman D. Doing qualitative research. London: UK SAGE Publ Ltd, 2017. p. 5.
  2. [12]Crotty M. The foundations of social research. London: SAGE, 1998. pp. 1– 17.
  3. [17]Riessman C. Narrative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 1993. pp. 30.
  4. [19]Mason M. Sample size and saturation in PhD studies using qualitative interviews. Forum Qual Sozialforsch 2010; 11(3): 8.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fish, E. C., & Lloyd, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • St Columba’s Hospice, Education and Research, Edinburgh, UK
Corresponding author
Fish, Ellis C.
Venue
Palliative Medicine
Published
2022-05-12
Volume
36
Issue
6
Pages
955-963
ISSN
  • 0269-2163 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-030X
OpenAlex
W4280491658
Cited by
20
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 1
FWCI
5.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Palliative Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Ethics in medical practice
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
Keywords
moral distress, COVID-19 pandemic, personal protective equipment, social distancing, employee morale, hospice inpatient unit, emotional distress
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Humans, Morals, Palliative Care, Qualitative Research, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review