Cited by 519Qualitative Research Methods and ApplicationsHealth Sciences Research and EducationMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

An introduction to reading and appraising qualitative research

Kuper, A., Reeves, S., Levinson, W.·2008·BMJ

Abstract

This article explores the difference between qualitative and quantitative research and the need for doctors to be able to interpret and appraise qualitative research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.a288

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kuper, A., Reeves, S., & Levinson, W.
Affiliations
  • Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Kuper, A.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2008-08-07
Volume
337
Issue
aug07 3
Pages
a288-a288
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2095068664
Cited by
519
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 37
FWCI
117.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Keywords
qualitative research, research appraisal, critical appraisal, qualitative versus quantitative research
MeSH terms
Data Interpretation, Statistical, Reading, Research Design, Reproducibility of Results, Comprehension, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review