Cited by 24Sleep and related disordersSleep and Work-Related FatigueSleep and Wakefulness Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Sleep and daytime sleepiness the next day following single night-time dose of fluvoxamine, dothiepin and placebo in normal volunteers

Wilson, S. J., Bailey, J. E., Alford, C., Nutt, D. J.·2000·Journal of Psychopharmacology

Abstract

To explore the effects of sedating and non-sedating antidepressants, we conducted a placebo-controlled, double-blind cross-over study in 12 normal subjects of the effects of a single night-time dose of fluvoxamine 100 mg, dothiepin 100 mg or placebo on night-time sleep recorded at home, and sleepiness and performance the following day. Night-time sleep was altered significantly by both drugs, with main effects on rapid eye movement (REM) sleep and sleep continuity. Dothiepin increased total sleep time, REM latency and stage 2 sleep and decreased arousals, wake after sleep onset and stage 1, whereas fluvoxamine decreased total sleep time and REM time and increased wake after sleep onset. Sleep latencies in daytime naps were significantly shorter for dothiepin and longer for fluvoxamine, showing that subjects were more sleepy when taking dothiepin. Electroencephalograms (EEG) performed during performance tasks failed to distinguish significantly between drugs. There were no significant differences between groups on our measures of tracking performance or reaction time; however, these tasks were designed primarily to provide a standard setting in which to monitor continuous EEG, and were unsuitable to detect sleepiness effects themselves. Saccadic eye movement velocity, acceleration and deceleration showed small non-significant changes after both drugs. Mood self ratings showed no significant differences among the groups. Subjective measures of night-time sleep reflected the objective measures of sleep continuity, and the items for difficulty and speed of wakening in the morning were significantly higher (i.e. more difficulty and slower) in the dothiepin group. The home-recorded sleep findings after fluvoxamine in this study were very similar to sleep laboratory studies with other antidepressant drugs, thus providing more validation of the home recording method.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/026988110001400420

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dothiepin (100mg) was associated with longer TST, shorter nocturnal disturbances, better sleep efficiency, and better sleep quality than fluvoxamine (100mg).

    “(Wilson et al., 2000) showed that dothiepin (100mg) was associated with longer TST, shorter nocturnal disturbances, better sleep efficiency, and better sleep quality than fluvoxamine (100mg).”

    From Antidepressants and their effect on sleep (2005) · cites this paper as Wilson et al., 2000

  • Although poorer subjective sleep quality was reported for fluvoxamine than dothiepin, perceptions upon waking were better.

    “Although poorer subjective sleep quality was reported for fluvoxamine than dothiepin, perceptions upon waking were better.”

    From Antidepressants and their effect on sleep (2005) · cites this paper as Wilson et al., 2000

  • Fluvoxamine (100mg) was associated with shorter and more disrupted sleep than with dothiepin (100mg) or placebo.

    “(Wilson et al., 2000) demonstrated that fluvoxamine (100mg) was associated with shorter and more disrupted sleep than with dothiepin (100mg) or placebo.”

    From Antidepressants and their effect on sleep (2005) · cites this paper as Wilson et al., 2000

  • In RCTs, prolonged sleep latency and reduced sleep time have been noted with sertraline, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine and paroxetine, particularly when compared to placebo and against sedative TCAs.

    “In RCTs, prolonged sleep latency and reduced sleep time have been noted with sertraline (Jindal et al., 2003), fluoxetine (Gillin et al., 1997), fluvoxamine (Wilson et al., 2000) and paroxetine (Hicks et al., 2002), particularly when compared to placebo and against the sedative TCAs.”

    From Antidepressants and their effect on sleep (2005) · cites this paper as Wilson et al., 2000

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. 10.1002/hup.470070104 · DOI
  2. 10.1177/0269881193007001061 · DOI
  3. 10.1177/026988119500900208 · DOI
  4. 10.1093/sleep/19.9.727 · DOI
  5. 10.1007/BF00172625 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1111/j.1472-8206.1990.tb00045.x · DOI
  7. 10.1111/j.2044-8341.1974.tb02285.x · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1093/sleep/5.S2.S67 · DOI
  9. 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1977.tb07528.x · DOI
  10. 10.1007/BF00174375 · DOI
  11. 10.1097/00007691-199212000-00010 · DOI
  12. Dominguez R A, 1985, J Clin Psychiatry, 46, 84
  13. Griffiths A, 1986, Acta Pharmacol Toxicol, 59, 120
  14. 10.1002/hup.470020307 · DOI
  15. 10.1177/026988119200600212 · DOI
  16. 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1991.tb05514.x · DOI
  17. Itil T M, 1974, Psychotropic drugs and the human EEG, 43
  18. Karger, 1990, J Clin Psychopharmacol, 10, 325
  19. 10.2165/00003495-198938010-00005 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/0006-3223(91)91290-8 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1016/0006-3223(91)90014-D · DOI
  22. Mercer A, 1988, Br J Clin Pharmacol, 25, 680
  23. 10.1016/0013-4694(95)00058-7 · DOI
  24. 10.1017/S0033291700014379 · DOI
  25. 10.1093/sleep/19.4.318 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1995.tb04468.x · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1093/aje/136.7.873 · DOI
  28. Rechtschaffen A, 1968, A manual of standardized terminology, techniques and scoring system for sleep stages of human subjects
  29. Richelson E, 1984, J Pharmacol Exp Therapeut, 230, 94, 10.1016/S0022-3565(25)21446-X · DOI
  30. 10.1093/sleep/16.4.301 · DOI
  31. 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1983.tb02128.x · DOI
  32. Saletu B, 1983, J Neural Transm, 00, 000
  33. 10.1093/sleep/7.1.18 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/0013-4694(87)90096-4 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1038/clpt.1991.122 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/0924-977X(95)90455-M · DOI
  37. 10.1016/0013-4694(93)90068-7 · DOI
  38. 10.1007/s002139900362 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wilson, S. J., Bailey, J. E., Alford, C., & Nutt, D. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • University of the West of England (GB)
Corresponding author
Wilson, S. J.
Venue
Journal of Psychopharmacology
Published
2000-07
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
378-386
ISSN
  • 0269-8811 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7285
OpenAlex
W2033377912
Cited by
24
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
Keywords
fluvoxamine, dothiepin, antidepressants, daytime sleepiness, nocturnal sleep, REM sleep, sleep continuity, wake after sleep onset, sleep latency, sedation, reaction time, mood
MeSH terms
Adult, Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic, Dothiepin, Double-Blind Method, Electroencephalography, Humans, Male, Psychomotor Performance, Mental Recall, Receptors, Serotonin, Saccades, Sleep, Sleep Stages, Fluvoxamine, Cross-Over Studies, Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation, Receptor, Serotonin, 5-HT2A

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review