Cited by 45Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorSleep and Work-Related FatigueSleep and Wakefulness Research

Selective effects of clonidine and temazepam on attention and memory

Tiplady, Brian, Bowness, Ellen, Stien, Laura, Drummond, Gordon·2005·Journal of Psychopharmacology

Abstract

The present study compared the effects of clonidine and temazepam on performance on a range of tasks aiming to assess the role of central noradrenergic mechanisms in cognitive function. Fifteen healthy volunteers (seven male, eight female), aged 18-25 years, took part in a five-period crossover study in which they received placebo, temazepam (15 and 30 mg) and clonidine (150 and 300 microg) by mouth in counterbalanced order in sessions at least 4 days apart. A test battery was administered before treatment and at 45, 90 and 135 min after the dose. Performance on most tests was significantly impaired in a dose-related fashion, and subjective sedation was recorded for both drugs. The greatest impairments with clonidine were on attention in the presence of distractors. Clonidine did not affect the formation of new long-term memories, in contrast to temazepam, but did impair measures of working memory. Subjective effects, especially feelings of drunkenness and abnormality, were particularly marked with clonidine. These results support the suggestion that central noradrenergic function may be involved in preventing distraction, but do not confirm other reports suggesting that some aspects of performance are improved with clonidine.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0269881105051529

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Impaired attention (as well as memory, working memory, reaction time and psychomotor function) has been observed after clonidine in neurotypical adults.

    “While only one of these studies reported reduced cognitive performance in a WM task (43), impaired attention (as well as memory, working memory, reaction time and psychomotor function) has been observed after clonidine in neurotypical adults (78, 79), which similarly to guanfacine, is also an α2-adrenergic receptor agonist and can cause sedation.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tiplady, B., Bowness, E., Stien, L., & Drummond, G.
Affiliations
University of Edinburgh (GB)
Venue
Journal of Psychopharmacology
Published
2005-05
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
259-265
ISSN
  • 0269-8811 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7285
OpenAlex
W2160182280
Cited by
45
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
Keywords
clonidine, temazepam, attention, memory, working memory, long-term memory formation, cognitive impairment, distraction, sedation, subjective effects, alpha-2 adrenergic agonists, benzodiazepines
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adrenergic alpha-Agonists, Adult, Attention, Clonidine, Cognition, Double-Blind Method, Female, Handwriting, Humans, Male, Memory, Memory, Short-Term, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Temazepam, Anti-Anxiety Agents, Cross-Over Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review