Cited by 28Eating Disorders and BehaviorsRegulation of Appetite and ObesityNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Dopamine and μ-opioid receptor dysregulation in the brains of binge-eating female rats – possible relevance in the psychopathology and treatment of binge-eating disorder

Heal, David J, Hallam, Michelle, Prow, Michael, Gosden, Jane, Cheetham, Sharon, Choi, Yong K, Tarazi, Frank, Hutson, Peter·2017·Journal of Psychopharmacology

Abstract

Adult, female rats given irregular, limited access to chocolate develop binge-eating behaviour with normal bodyweight and compulsive/perseverative and impulsive behaviours similar to those in binge-eating disorder. We investigated whether (a) dysregulated central nervous system dopaminergic and opioidergic systems are part of the psychopathology of binge-eating and (b) these neurotransmitter systems may mediate the actions of drugs ameliorating binge-eating disorder psychopathology. Binge-eating produced a 39% reduction of striatal D 1 receptors with 22% and 23% reductions in medial and lateral caudate putamen and a 22% increase of striatal μ-opioid receptors. There was no change in D 1 receptor density in nucleus accumbens, medial prefrontal cortex or dorsolateral frontal cortex, striatal D 2 receptors and dopamine reuptake transporter sites, or μ-opioid receptors in frontal cortex. There were no changes in ligand affinities. The concentrations of monoamines, metabolites and estimates of dopamine (dopamine/dihydroxyphenylacetic acid ratio) and serotonin/5-hydroxyindolacetic acid ratio turnover rates were unchanged in striatum and frontal cortex. However, turnover of dopamine and serotonin in the hypothalamus was increased ~20% and ~15%, respectively. Striatal transmission via D 1 receptors is decreased in binge-eating rats while μ-opioid receptor signalling may be increased. These changes are consistent with the attenuation of binge-eating by lisdexamfetamine, which increases catecholaminergic neurotransmission, and nalmefene, a μ-opioid antagonist.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0269881117699607

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heal, D. J., Hallam, M., Prow, M., Gosden, J., Cheetham, S., Choi, Y. K., Tarazi, F., & Hutson, P.
Affiliations
  • RenaSci (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Teva Pharmaceuticals (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Heal, David J
Venue
Journal of Psychopharmacology
Published
2017-04-05
Volume
31
Issue
6
Pages
770-783
ISSN
  • 0269-8811 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7285
OpenAlex
W2604619977
Cited by
28
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3
FWCI
4.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
binge eating disorder, dopamine, dopamine D1 receptor, mu-opioid receptor, striatum, caudate-putamen, lisdexamfetamine, nalmefene, compulsive eating, serotonin turnover, hypothalamus, female rats, opioid antagonists
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Bulimia, Dopamine, Female, Naltrexone, Narcotic Antagonists, Psychopathology, Rats, Wistar, Receptors, Dopamine D1, Receptors, Dopamine D2, Receptors, Opioid, mu, Dopamine Plasma Membrane Transport Proteins, Rats, Binge-Eating Disorder

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review