Cited by 8Schizophrenia research and treatmentBipolar Disorder and TreatmentPsychiatric care and mental health services

Psychiatric hospitalization following antipsychotic medication cessation in first episode psychosis

Open access
Hayes, Joseph F, Osborn, David PJ, Lundin, Andreas, Dalman, Christina·2019·Journal of Psychopharmacology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are questions about the risk-benefit balance of longer-term antipsychotic medication treatment following first episode psychosis, especially in relation to relapse because of dopamine supersensitivity following treatment cessation. AIM: The purpose of this study was to determine whether hospitalization rates in first episode psychosis patients are associated with length of initial oral antipsychotic medication exposure. METHODS: We examined psychiatric hospitalization rates in patients experiencing first episode of psychosis from the total population of Sweden between 1 January 2007-31 December 2016 ( n=7043). We categorised patients by the length of first antipsychotic treatment (<6 months, 6 months to <1 year, 1 year to <2 years, 2 years to <5 years and ⩾5 years). RESULTS: Compared to those treated for <6 months, individuals receiving oral antipsychotic medications for ⩾5 years had less than half the cumulative incidence of hospitalization at all times between 1-4 years after treatment cessation. CONCLUSION: We found no evidence that hospitalization rates increased with increasing baseline antipsychotic exposure.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0269881119827883

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hayes, J. F., Osborn, D. P., Lundin, A., & Dalman, C.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Corresponding author
Hayes, Joseph F
Venue
Journal of Psychopharmacology
Published
2019-02-19
Volume
33
Issue
4
Pages
532-534
ISSN
  • 0269-8811 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7285
OpenAlex
W2916168578
Cited by
8
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd (523-2010-1052)
  • Wellcome Trust (211085/Z/18/Z)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
first-episode psychosis, antipsychotic drugs, treatment discontinuation, psychiatric hospitalization, relapse, dopamine supersensitivity, cumulative incidence
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Hospitalization, Hospitals, Psychiatric, Humans, Male, Psychotic Disorders, Recurrence, Registries, Sweden, Time Factors, Antipsychotic Agents, Withholding Treatment, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review