Does the Internet Make the World Worse? Depression, Aggression and Polarization in the Social Media Age
Abstract
Since the 1990s, the influence of the internet and social media in daily communication has skyrocketed. This has brought both remarkable opportunities and perceived perils. Recent years have seen increases in suicide and mental health concerns, political polarization, and online aggression. Can such phenomenon be connected causally to communication via social media? This article reviews the evidence for perceived deleterious effects of social media on several areas of human welfare, including political polarization, depression and suicide, aggression, and cyberbullying. In addition to examining contemporary evidence from psychological studies, a historical analysis is included to examine whether we truly live in a uniquely difficult time or whether similar patterns of social behavior can be witnessed in other, pre-internet times. It is concluded that evidence may link social media to some negative social outcomes but in ways that are nuanced and complicated, often interacting with user motivations and personalities and situational variables. An increased focus on preregistered, standardized scientific methods and cautious interpretation of effect sizes can help clarify real versus phantom effects of social media.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Direct evidence supporting conclusions that algorithms fuel mental-health issues and political polarization remains scarce.
“However, direct evidence supporting these conclusions remains scarce (Bail, 2021; Ferguson, 2021; Sumpter, 2018).”
From Social Drivers and Algorithmic Mechanisms on Digital Media. (2024) · cites this paper as Ferguson, 2021
The direction of effects between social-media usage and mental health is unclear.
“The direction of effects between social-media usage and mental health is unclear (Ferguson, 2021; Luhmann et al., 2022; Orben et al., 2019);”
From Social Drivers and Algorithmic Mechanisms on Digital Media. (2024) · cites this paper as Ferguson, 2021
Cites
An effect size primer: A guide for clinicians and researchers.
Ferguson, C. J. (2009) · Professional Psychology: Research and Practice · doi:10.1037/a0015808 · Cited by 3,467 · see citing works
Self-citationKowalski, R. M., Giumetti, G. W., Schroeder, A. N., & Lattanner, M. R. (2014) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0035618 · Cited by 3,266 · see citing works
Twenge, J. M., Joiner, T. E., Rogers, M. L., & Martin, G. N. (2018) · Clinical Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/2167702617723376 · Cited by 1,705 · see citing works
The association between adolescent well-being and digital technology use
Orben, A., & Przybylski, A. K. (2019) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-018-0506-1 · Cited by 1,500 · cited 5× · see citing works
“By contrast, psychologists Amy Orben and Andrew Przybylski argue that the data does not support evidence for even a correlational link and these concerns are more akin to moral panic than good science (Orben & Przybylski, 2019a, 2019b).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialTwenge, J. M., Cooper, A. B., Joiner, T. E., Duffy, M. E., & Binau, S. G. (2019) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/abn0000410 · Cited by 1,469 · see citing works
Online and offline social networks: Use of social networking sites by emerging adults
Subrahmanyam, K., Reich, S. M., Waechter, N., & Espinoza, G. (2008) · Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2008.07.003 · Cited by 1,284 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This approach is also consistent with Co-construction Theory (e.g. Subrahmanyam et al., 2008).”
ResultLin, L. Y., Sidani, J. E., Shensa, A., Radovic, A., Miller, E., Colditz, J. B., Hoffman, B. L., Giles, L. M., & Primack, B. A. (2016) · Depression and Anxiety · doi:10.1002/da.22466 · Cited by 1,111 · see citing works
Online communication, social media and adolescent wellbeing: A systematic narrative review
Best, P., Manktelow, R., & Taylor, B. (2014) · Children and Youth Services Review · doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.03.001 · Cited by 1,067 · see citing works
Przybylski, A. K., & Weinstein, N. (2017) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797616678438 · Cited by 890 · see citing works
Social media’s enduring effect on adolescent life satisfaction
Orben, A., Dienlin, T., & Przybylski, A. K. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1902058116 · Cited by 485 · see citing works
Time spent on social network sites and psychological well-being: a meta-analysis
Huang, C. (2017) · Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking · doi:10.1089/cyber.2016.0758 · Cited by 457 · see citing works
Media Use Is Linked to Lower Psychological Well-Being: Evidence from Three Datasets
Twenge, J. M., & Campbell, W. K. (2019) · Psychiatric Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11126-019-09630-7 · Cited by 429 · see citing works
Screens, Teens, and Psychological Well-Being: Evidence From Three Time-Use-Diary Studies
Orben, A., & Przybylski, A. K. (2019) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797619830329 · Cited by 414 · see citing works
Krasnova, H., Widjaja, T., Buxmann, P., Wenninger, H., & Benbasat, I. (2015) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2015.0588 · Cited by 304 · see citing works
Heffer, T., Good, M., Daly, O., MacDonell, E., & Willoughby, T. (2019) · Clinical Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/2167702618812727 · Cited by 278 · see citing works
Jensen, M., George, M. J., Russell, M. R., & Odgers, C. L. (2019) · Clinical Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/2167702619859336 · Cited by 242 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For instance, outside the datasets discussed earlier, several longitudinal analyses (e.g. Heffner et al., 2019; Jensen et al., 2019) have not found that social media or screen use more generally is associated with increased mental health problems.”
BackgroundDavila, J., Hershenberg, R., Feinstein, B. A., Gorman, K., Bhatia, V., & Starr, L. R. (2012) · Psychology of Popular Media Culture · doi:10.1037/a0027512 · Cited by 237 · see citing works
Putting Their Best Foot Forward: Emotional Disclosure on Facebook
Qiu, L., Lin, H., Leung, A. K., & Tov, W. (2012) · Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking · doi:10.1089/cyber.2012.0200 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
Cyberbullying and adolescent well-being in England: a population-based cross-sectional study
Przybylski, A. K., & Bowes, L. (2017) · The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/s2352-4642(17)30011-1 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Park, J., Lee, D. S., Shablack, H., Verduyn, P., Deldin, P., Ybarra, O., Jonides, J., & Kross, E. (2016) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2016.01.048 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Social Drivers and Algorithmic Mechanisms on Digital Media.
Metzler, H., & Garcia, D. (2024) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916231185057 · Cited by 204 · see citing works
“However, direct evidence supporting these conclusions remains scarce (Bail, 2021; Ferguson, 2021; Sumpter, 2018).”
Background
- Authors
- Ferguson, C. J.
- Affiliations
- Stetson University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ferguson, Christopher J.
- Venue
- Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2021-12
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 116-135
- ISSN
- 0270-4676 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-4183
- OpenAlex
- W4200311412
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 4
- FWCI
- 7.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Bulletin of Science Technology & Society (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Digital Media and Philosophy
- Keywords
- social media, internet influence, depression, suicide, political polarization, online aggression, cyberbullying, mental health, comparative history, user motivation, personality, effect size interpretation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review