Cited by 33Impact of Technology on AdolescentsSocial Media and PoliticsDigital Media and Philosophy

Does the Internet Make the World Worse? Depression, Aggression and Polarization in the Social Media Age

Ferguson, Christopher J.·2021·Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society

Abstract

Since the 1990s, the influence of the internet and social media in daily communication has skyrocketed. This has brought both remarkable opportunities and perceived perils. Recent years have seen increases in suicide and mental health concerns, political polarization, and online aggression. Can such phenomenon be connected causally to communication via social media? This article reviews the evidence for perceived deleterious effects of social media on several areas of human welfare, including political polarization, depression and suicide, aggression, and cyberbullying. In addition to examining contemporary evidence from psychological studies, a historical analysis is included to examine whether we truly live in a uniquely difficult time or whether similar patterns of social behavior can be witnessed in other, pre-internet times. It is concluded that evidence may link social media to some negative social outcomes but in ways that are nuanced and complicated, often interacting with user motivations and personalities and situational variables. An increased focus on preregistered, standardized scientific methods and cautious interpretation of effect sizes can help clarify real versus phantom effects of social media.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/02704676211064567

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Direct evidence supporting conclusions that algorithms fuel mental-health issues and political polarization remains scarce.

    “However, direct evidence supporting these conclusions remains scarce (Bail, 2021; Ferguson, 2021; Sumpter, 2018).”

    From Social Drivers and Algorithmic Mechanisms on Digital Media. (2024) · cites this paper as Ferguson, 2021

  • The direction of effects between social-media usage and mental health is unclear.

    “The direction of effects between social-media usage and mental health is unclear (Ferguson, 2021; Luhmann et al., 2022; Orben et al., 2019);”

    From Social Drivers and Algorithmic Mechanisms on Digital Media. (2024) · cites this paper as Ferguson, 2021

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ferguson, C. J.
Affiliations
Stetson University (US)
Corresponding author
Ferguson, Christopher J.
Venue
Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society
Published
2021-12
Volume
41
Issue
4
Pages
116-135
ISSN
  • 0270-4676 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4183
OpenAlex
W4200311412
Cited by
33
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 4
FWCI
7.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Bulletin of Science Technology & Society (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Digital Media and Philosophy
Keywords
social media, internet influence, depression, suicide, political polarization, online aggression, cyberbullying, mental health, comparative history, user motivation, personality, effect size interpretation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review