Cited by 1,469Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesMental Health Treatment and AccessChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Age, period, and cohort trends in mood disorder indicators and suicide-related outcomes in a nationally representative dataset, 2005-2017

Open access
Twenge, Jean M., Cooper, A. Bell, Joiner, Thomas E., Duffy, Mary E., Binau, Sarah G.·2019·Journal of Abnormal Psychology

Abstract

Drawing from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH; N = 611,880), a nationally representative survey of U.S. adolescents and adults, we assess age, period, and cohort trends in mood disorders and suicide-related outcomes since the mid-2000s. Rates of major depressive episode in the last year increased 52% 2005-2017 (from 8.7% to 13.2%) among adolescents aged 12 to 17 and 63% 2009-2017 (from 8.1% to 13.2%) among young adults 18-25. Serious psychological distress in the last month and suicide-related outcomes (suicidal ideation, plans, attempts, and deaths by suicide) in the last year also increased among young adults 18-25 from 2008-2017 (with a 71% increase in serious psychological distress), with less consistent and weaker increases among adults ages 26 and over. Hierarchical linear modeling analyses separating the effects of age, period, and birth cohort suggest the trends among adults are primarily due to cohort, with a steady rise in mood disorder and suicide-related outcomes between cohorts born from the early 1980s (Millennials) to the late 1990s (iGen). Cultural trends contributing to an increase in mood disorders and suicidal thoughts and behaviors since the mid-2000s, including the rise of electronic communication and digital media and declines in sleep duration, may have had a larger impact on younger people, creating a cohort effect. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/abn0000410

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Twenge, J. M., Cooper, A. B., Joiner, T. E., Duffy, M. E., & Binau, S. G.
Affiliations
  • San Diego State University (US)
  • Lynn University (US)
  • Florida State University (US)
  • Pomona College (US)
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Psychology
Published
2019-04
Volume
128
Issue
3
Pages
185-199
ISSN
  • 0021-843X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1846
OpenAlex
W2921393753
Cited by
1,469
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 150 · 2025: 196 · 2024: 193 · 2023: 284 · 2022: 206 · 2021: 201 · 2020: 198 · 2019: 38 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
187.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Abnormal Psychology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (NSF 1449440)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
mood disorders, major depressive episode, suicide, suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, serious psychological distress, age-period-cohort analysis, birth cohort effects, adolescents, young adults, digital media use, sleep duration, cultural trends, National Survey on Drug Use and Health
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Suicide, Suicide, Attempted, United States, Cohort Studies, Age Distribution, Mood Disorders, Substance-Related Disorders, Internet, Young Adult, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review