The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantitative assessment of brain glucose metabolic rates using in vivo deuterium magnetic resonance spectroscopy
Open accessAbstract
Quantitative assessment of cerebral glucose consumption rate (CMR glc) and tricarboxylic acid cycle flux (V TCA) is crucial for understanding neuroenergetics under physiopathological conditions. In this study, we report a novel in vivo Deuterium (2 H) MRS (DMRS) approach for simultaneously measuring and quantifying CMR glc and V TCA in rat brains at 16.4 Tesla. Following a brief infusion of deuterated glucose, dynamic changes of isotope-labeled glucose, glutamate/glutamine (Glx) and water contents in the brain can be robustly monitored from their well-resolved 2 H resonances. Dynamic DMRS glucose and Glx data were employed to determine CMR glc and V TCA concurrently. To test the sensitivity of this method in response to altered glucose metabolism, two brain conditions with different anesthetics were investigated. Increased CMR glc (0.46 vs. 0.28 µmol/g/min) and V TCA (0.96 vs. 0.6 µmol/g/min) were found in rats under morphine as compared to deeper anesthesia using 2% isoflurane. This study demonstrates the feasibility and new utility of the in vivo DMRS approach to assess cerebral glucose metabolic rates at high/ultrahigh field. It provides an alternative MRS tool for in vivo study of metabolic coupling relationship between aerobic and anaerobic glucose metabolisms in brain under physiopathological states.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sokoloff, L., Reivich, M., Kennedy, C., Rosiers, M. H. D., Patlak, C. S., Pettigrew, K. D., Sakurada, O., & Shinohara, M. (1977) · Journal of Neurochemistry · doi:10.1111/j.1471-4159.1977.tb10649.x · Cited by 6,000
Nonoxidative Glucose Consumption During Focal Physiologic Neural Activity
Fox, P. T., Raichle, M. E., Mintun, M. A., & Dence, C. (1988) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3260686 · Cited by 1,796
State of the art direct 13 C and indirect 1 H‐[ 13 C] NMR spectroscopy in vivo . A practical guide
de Graaf, R. A., Rothman, D. L., & Behar, K. L. (2011) · NMR in Biomedicine · doi:10.1002/nbm.1761 · Cited by 117
Cited by
Brain Glucose Metabolism: Integration of Energetics with Function
Dienel, G. A. (2019) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00062.2017 · Cited by 865
Rothman, D. L., de Graaf, R. A., Hyder, F., Mason, G. F., Behar, K. L., & De Feyter, H. M. (2019) · NMR in Biomedicine · doi:10.1002/nbm.4172 · Cited by 53
Deuterium metabolic imaging reports on tert expression and early response to therapy in cancer
Batsios, G., Taglang, C., Tran, M., Stevers, N., Barger, C., Gillespie, A. M., Ronen, S. M., Costello, J. F., & Viswanath, P. (2022) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-4418 · Cited by 40
Imaging cancer metabolism using magnetic resonance
Brindle, K. M. (2024) · npj Imaging · doi:10.1038/s44303-023-00004-0 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Lu, M., Zhu, X.-H., Zhang, Y., Mateescu, G., & Chen, W.
- Venue
- Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2017-05-15
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3518-3530
- ISSN
- 0271-678X (ISSN-L)
- 1559-7016
- OpenAlex
- W2615708158
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 3.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantitative assessment of brain glucose metabolic rates using in vivo deuterium magnetic resonance spectroscopy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0271678x17706444
- The paper
- Lu, M., Zhu, X.-H., Zhang, Y., Mateescu, G., & Chen, W. (2017). Quantitative assessment of brain glucose metabolic rates using in vivo deuterium magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271678x17706444
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.