Cited by 52Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAttachment and Relationship DynamicsAdolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health

Early Adolescent Romantic Partner Status, Peer Standing, and Problem Behaviors

Open access
Miller, Shari, Lansford, Jennifer E., Costanzo, Philip, Malone, Patrick S., Golonka, Megan, Killeya-Jones, Ley A.·2009·The Journal of Early Adolescence

Abstract

This study examined associations among early adolescent romantic relationships, peer standing, problem behaviors, and gender as a moderator of these associations, in a sample of 320 seventh-grade students. Popular and controversial status youth were more likely to have a romantic partner, whereas neglected status youth were less likely to have a romantic partner. Similarly, youth perceived as conventional and unconventional leaders were also more likely to have a romantic partner than were non-leaders. Youth who had a romantic partner drank more alcohol and were more aggressive than were youth who did not have a romantic partner. Among those youth who had romantic partners, those who reported having more deviance-prone partners were themselves more likely to use alcohol and to be more aggressive, and those who engaged in deviant behavior with their partners used more alcohol. However, these associations varied somewhat by gender. These findings underscore the salience of early romantic partner relationships in the adjustment of early adolescents.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0272431609332665

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Those who engage in romantic relationships are generally perceived as more popular by their peers.

    “Indeed, some studies point towards the benefits of engaging in dating in adolescence, as those who engage in romantic relationships report higher self-esteem in middle and late adolescence (Ciairano et al. 2006) and are generally perceived as more popular by their peers (Miller et al. 2009).”

    From Patterns of Romantic Relationship Experiences and Psychosocial Adjustment From Adolescence to Young Adulthood (2021) · cites this paper as Miller et al. 2009

    The Results (Peer Standing and Romantic Relationships; page unavailable) find that peer-classified popular seventh-graders were more likely than average-status students to report a romantic partner. This supports an association between dating and peer popularity, but the claim generalizes beyond the study’s early-adolescent sample. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Buhrmester D Furman W Derlega V Winstead B 1986 The changing functions of children’s friendship: A neo-Sullivanian perspective Friendships and social interaction 41 62 New York Springer
  2. Golombok S Fivush R 1994 Gender development New York Cambridge University Press
  3. Merton DE 1996 Going-with: The role of a social form in early romantic Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 24 462 484
  4. Miller-Johnson S Costanzo P Coie JD Rose MR Browne DC Johnson C 2003 Peer relations and problem behaviors among African American early adolescents Journal of Youth and Adolescence 32 275 284

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miller, S., Lansford, J. E., Costanzo, P., Malone, P. S., Golonka, M., & Killeya-Jones, L. A.
Affiliations
  • RTI International (US)
  • Duke University (US)
  • University of South Carolina (US)
  • Duke University
Corresponding author
Miller, Shari
Venue
The Journal of Early Adolescence
Published
2009-04-09
Volume
29
Issue
6
Pages
839-861
ISSN
  • 0272-4316 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5449
OpenAlex
W2170935751
Cited by
52
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Early Adolescence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5p20da017589-05)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K01MH067975)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (P20- DA017589)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
Keywords
adolescent romantic relationships, peer status, peer leadership, deviant peer influence, alcohol consumption, aggression, behavioral problems, gender differences, early adolescence, peer acceptance, peer rejection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review