Cited by 105Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeEconomic and Environmental ValuationDelphi Technique in Research

Uncertainty and patient heterogeneity in medical decision models

Groot Koerkamp, Bas, Weinstein, Milton C., Stijnen, Theo, Heijenbrok-Kal, M.H., Hunink, M.G. Myriam·2010·Medical Decision Making

Abstract

Parameter uncertainty, patient heterogeneity, and stochastic uncertainty of outcomes are increasingly important concepts in medical decision models. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the various methods to analyze uncertainty and patient heterogeneity in a decision model. The authors distinguish various purposes of medical decision modeling, serving various stakeholders. Differences and analogies between the analyses are pointed out, as well as practical issues. The analyses are demonstrated with an example comparing imaging tests for patients with chest pain. For complicated analyses step-by-step algorithms are provided. The focus is on Monte Carlo simulation and value of information analysis. Increasing model complexity is a major challenge for probabilistic sensitivity analysis and value of information analysis. The authors discuss nested analyses that are required in patient-level models, and in nonlinear models for analyses of partial value of information analysis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0272989x09342277

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The cohort and individual-based state-transition frameworks focused on in this report do not capture interactions, model a single closed cohort, and allow transitions to occur only at specified time intervals.

    “These frameworks do not capture interactions, model a single (closed) cohort, and allow transitions to occur only at specified time intervals.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Groot Koerkamp, B., Weinstein, M. C., Stijnen, T., Heijenbrok-Kal, M. H., & Hunink, M. G. M.
Affiliations
  • Department of Surgery at Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Program for the Assessment of Radiological Technology, Departments of Radiology and Epidemiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
  • Program in Health Decision Sciences, Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Erasmus MC (NL)
Venue
Medical Decision Making
Published
2010-02-26
Volume
30
Issue
2
Pages
194-205
ISSN
  • 0272-989X (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-681X
OpenAlex
W2050301935
Cited by
105
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 19
FWCI
24.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Decision Making (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Delphi Technique in Research
Keywords
uncertainty analysis, patient heterogeneity, parameter uncertainty, aleatoric uncertainty, Monte Carlo simulation, value of information analysis, probabilistic sensitivity analysis, nested analysis, nonlinear models, model complexity
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Cardiovascular Agents, Coronary Disease, Costs and Cost Analysis, Decision Support Techniques, Humans, Male, Markov Chains, Middle Aged, Monte Carlo Method, Cohort Studies, Coronary Angiography, Uncertainty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review