The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Motion planning under uncertainty using iterative local optimization in belief space
Abstract
We present a new approach to motion planning under sensing and motion uncertainty by computing a locally optimal solution to a continuous partially observable Markov decision process (POMDP). Our approach represents beliefs (the distributions of the robot’s state estimate) by Gaussian distributions and is applicable to robot systems with non-linear dynamics and observation models. The method follows the general POMDP solution framework in which we approximate the belief dynamics using an extended Kalman filter and represent the value function by a quadratic function that is valid in the vicinity of a nominal trajectory through belief space. Using a belief space variant of iterative LQG (iLQG), our approach iterates with second-order convergence towards a linear control policy over the belief space that is locally optimal with respect to a user-defined cost function. Unlike previous work, our approach does not assume maximum-likelihood observations, does not assume fixed estimator or control gains, takes into account obstacles in the environment, and does not require discretization of the state and action spaces. The running time of the algorithm is polynomial (O[n 6]) in the dimension n of the state space. We demonstrate the potential of our approach in simulation for holonomic and non-holonomic robots maneuvering through environments with obstacles with noisy and partial sensing and with non-linear dynamics and observation models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bellman, R. E. (2010) · doi:10.1515/9781400835386 · Cited by 14,588
(1995) · Cited by 10,558
Thrun, S. (2002) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/504729.504754 · Cited by 7,994
Unscented Filtering and Nonlinear Estimation
Julier, S. J., & Uhlmann, J. K. (2004) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2003.823141 · Cited by 6,588
Planning and acting in partially observable stochastic domains
Kaelbling, L. P., Littman, M. L., & Cassandra, A. R. (1998) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/s0004-3702(98)00023-x · Cited by 4,149
Randomized Kinodynamic Planning
LaValle, S. M., & Kuffner, J. J. (2001) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/02783640122067453 · Cited by 3,254
Advances in neural information processing systems 11
Peter Sollich, A. (1999) · Cited by 3,168
Practical Methods for Optimal Control using Nonlinear Programming
Betts, & Kolmanovsky (2002) · Applied Mechanics Reviews · doi:10.1115/1.1483351 · Cited by 1,443
The Complexity of Markov Decision Processes
Papadimitriou, C. H., & Tsitsiklis, J. N. (1987) · Mathematics of Operations Research · doi:10.1287/moor.12.3.441 · Cited by 1,329
SARSOP: Efficient Point-Based POMDP Planning by Approximating Optimally Reachable Belief Spaces
Kurniawati, H., Hsu, D., & Sun Lee, W. (2008) · Robotics: Science and Systems IV · doi:10.15607/rss.2008.iv.009 · Cited by 759
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Erez T, 2010, 26th conference on uncertainty in artificial intelligence (UAI 2010), 160
- 10.1109/9.86943 · doi:10.1109/9.86943
- Porta J, 2006, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 7, 2329
- van den Berg J, 2011, 15th international symposium on robotics research (ISRR 2011)
- van den Berg J, 2012, 26th AAAI conference on artificial intelligence
- 10.1007/978-3-0348-7539-4_10 · doi:10.1007/978-3-0348-7539-4_10
- 10.1016/B978-0-12-012731-3.50008-1 · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-012731-3.50008-1
Cited by
Past, Present, and Future of Simultaneous Localization and Mapping: Toward the Robust-Perception Age
Cadena, C., Carlone, L., Carrillo, H., Latif, Y., Scaramuzza, D., Neira, J., Reid, I., & Leonard, J. J. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Robotics · doi:10.1109/tro.2016.2624754 · Cited by 3,596
Sampling-based robotic information gathering algorithms
Hollinger, G. A., & Sukhatme, G. S. (2014) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/0278364914533443 · Cited by 334
Indelman, V., Carlone, L., & Dellaert, F. (2015) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/0278364914561102 · Cited by 154
Patil, S., Kahn, G., Laskey, M., Schulman, J., Goldberg, K., & Abbeel, P. (2015) · Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-16595-0_30 · Cited by 72
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- van den Berg, J., Patil, S., & Alterovitz, R.
- Venue
- The International Journal of Robotics Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2012-09
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1263-1278
- ISSN
- 0278-3649 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-3176
- OpenAlex
- W2164429173
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 32
- FWCI
- 16.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Motion planning under uncertainty using iterative local optimization in belief space. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0278364912456319
- The paper
- van den Berg, J., Patil, S., & Alterovitz, R. (2012). Motion planning under uncertainty using iterative local optimization in belief space. The International Journal of Robotics Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0278364912456319
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.