Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 299

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Motion planning under uncertainty using iterative local optimization in belief space

van den Berg, Jur, Patil, Sachin, Alterovitz, Ron·2012·The International Journal of Robotics Research

Abstract

We present a new approach to motion planning under sensing and motion uncertainty by computing a locally optimal solution to a continuous partially observable Markov decision process (POMDP). Our approach represents beliefs (the distributions of the robot’s state estimate) by Gaussian distributions and is applicable to robot systems with non-linear dynamics and observation models. The method follows the general POMDP solution framework in which we approximate the belief dynamics using an extended Kalman filter and represent the value function by a quadratic function that is valid in the vicinity of a nominal trajectory through belief space. Using a belief space variant of iterative LQG (iLQG), our approach iterates with second-order convergence towards a linear control policy over the belief space that is locally optimal with respect to a user-defined cost function. Unlike previous work, our approach does not assume maximum-likelihood observations, does not assume fixed estimator or control gains, takes into account obstacles in the environment, and does not require discretization of the state and action spaces. The running time of the algorithm is polynomial (O[n 6]) in the dimension n of the state space. We demonstrate the potential of our approach in simulation for holonomic and non-holonomic robots maneuvering through environments with obstacles with noisy and partial sensing and with non-linear dynamics and observation models.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0278364912456319

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 32 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Erez T, 2010, 26th conference on uncertainty in artificial intelligence (UAI 2010), 160
  2. 10.1109/9.86943 · doi:10.1109/9.86943
  3. Porta J, 2006, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 7, 2329
  4. van den Berg J, 2011, 15th international symposium on robotics research (ISRR 2011)
  5. van den Berg J, 2012, 26th AAAI conference on artificial intelligence
  6. 10.1007/978-3-0348-7539-4_10 · doi:10.1007/978-3-0348-7539-4_10
  7. 10.1016/B978-0-12-012731-3.50008-1 · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-012731-3.50008-1

Cited by

See all 299

Metadata

Authors
van den Berg, J., Patil, S., & Alterovitz, R.
Venue
The International Journal of Robotics Research
Published
2012-09
Volume
31
Issue
11
Pages
1263-1278
ISSN
  • 0278-3649 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-3176
OpenAlex
W2164429173
Cited by
299
References
32
FWCI
16.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Motion planning under uncertainty using iterative local optimization in belief space. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0278364912456319
The paper
van den Berg, J., Patil, S., & Alterovitz, R. (2012). Motion planning under uncertainty using iterative local optimization in belief space. The International Journal of Robotics Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0278364912456319

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.