The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nonlinear factor recovery for long-term SLAM
Abstract
For long-term operations, graph-based simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) approaches require nodes to be marginalized in order to control the computational cost. In this paper, we present a method to recover a set of nonlinear factors that best represents the marginal distribution in terms of Kullback–Leibler divergence. The proposed method, which we call nonlinear factor recovery (NFR), estimates both the mean and the information matrix of the set of nonlinear factors, where the recovery of the latter is equivalent to solving a convex optimization problem. NFR is able to provide either the dense distribution or a sparse approximation of it. In contrast to previous algorithms, our method does not necessarily require a global linearization point and can be used with any nonlinear measurement function. Moreover, we are not restricted to only using tree-based sparse approximations and binary factors, but we can include any topology and correlations between measurements. Experiments performed on several publicly available datasets demonstrate that our method outperforms the state of the art with respect to the Kullback–Leibler divergence and the sparsity of the solution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Carlevaris-Bianco and Eustice, and Mazuran et al. introduce the Generic Linear Constraint (GLC) factors and the Nonlinear Graph Sparsification (NGS) method, respectively.
“Carlevaris-Bianco and Eustice [28], and Mazuran et al. [170] introduce the Generic Linear Constraint (GLC) factors and the Nonlinear Graph Sparsification (NGS) method, respectively.”
From Past, Present, and Future of Simultaneous Localization and Mapping: Toward the Robust-Perception Age (2016) · cites this paper as [170]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fast iterative alignment of pose graphs with poor initial estimates
Olson, E., Leonard, J., & Teller, S. (2006) · Proceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2006. ICRA 2006. · doi:10.1109/robot.2006.1642040 · Cited by 427
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 36
- 10.1145/1143844.1143856 · DOI
- 10.1561/2200000016 · DOI · Paper page
- Boyd S, 2009, Convex optimization
- 10.1109/IROS.2013.6696478 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICRA.2013.6631403 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/ICRA.2014.6906954 · DOI
- 10.1109/TRO.2014.2347571 · DOI
- 10.1109/TIT.1968.1054142 · DOI
- 10.1177/0278364906072768 · DOI · Paper page
- Duchi JC, 2008, Proceedings of the conference in uncertainty in artificial intelligence
- 10.1109/IROS.2010.5649205 · DOI
- 10.1109/IROS.2005.1545053 · DOI
- 10.1109/ROBOT.2004.1307180 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10514-006-9043-2 · DOI
- 10.1109/ROBOT.2007.364221 · DOI
- 10.1093/biostatistics/kxm045 · DOI · Paper page
- Golub GH, 1996, Matrix Computations
- 10.1109/MITS.2010.939925 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.15607/RSS.2007.III.009 · DOI
- 10.1016/0024-3795(88)90223-6 · DOI
- 10.1109/ECMR.2013.6698835 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s10514-009-9153-8 · DOI
- 10.1109/TRO.2009.2034435 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/ICRA.2013.6630556 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/ROBOT.2007.363563 · DOI
- 10.1109/IROS.2009.5354121 · DOI
- 10.1177/0278364912455072 · DOI
- 10.1109/IROS.2011.6094414 · DOI · Paper page
- Kümmerle R, 2011, Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on robotics and automation
- 10.15607/RSS.2014.X.040 · DOI
- 10.1090/S0025-5718-1980-0572855-7 · DOI
- Paskin MA, 2003, Proceedings of the international joint conference on artificial intelligence
- Schmidt M, 2009, Proceedings of the international conference on artificial intelligence and statistics
- 10.1177/0278364904045479 · DOI
- 10.1137/S0895479896303430 · DOI
- 10.1109/IROS.2011.6095128 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Past, Present, and Future of Simultaneous Localization and Mapping: Toward the Robust-Perception Age
Cadena, C., Carlone, L., Carrillo, H., Latif, Y., Scaramuzza, D., Neira, J., Reid, I., & Leonard, J. J. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Robotics · doi:10.1109/tro.2016.2624754 · Cited by 3,596
Metadata
- Authors
- Mazuran, M., Burgard, W., & Tipaldi, G. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Freiburg (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Mazuran, Mladen
- ORCID
- Burgard, Wolfram
- Venue
- The International Journal of Robotics Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2015-06-29
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 1-3
- Pages
- 50-72
- ISSN
- 0278-3649 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-3176
- OpenAlex
- W900890939
- Cited by
- 63
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 8.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The International Journal of Robotics Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Target Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
- Keywords
- graph-based SLAM, marginal distribution estimation, Kullback-Leibler divergence, sparse approximation, convex optimization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review