Cited by 48Robotics and Sensor-Based LocalizationRobotic Path Planning AlgorithmsTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Efficient information-theoretic graph pruning for graph-based SLAM with laser range finders

Kretzschmar, H., Stachniss, C., Grisetti, G.·2011·2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems

Abstract

In graph-based SLAM, the pose graph encodes the poses of the robot during data acquisition as well as spatial constraints between them. The size of the pose graph has a substantial influence on the runtime and the memory requirements of a SLAM system, which hinders long-term mapping. In this paper, we address the problem of efficient information-theoretic compression of pose graphs. Our approach estimates the expected information gain of laser measurements with respect to the resulting occupancy grid map. It allows for restricting the size of the pose graph depending on the information that the robot acquires about the environment or based on a given memory limit, which results in an any-space SLAM system. When discarding laser scans, our approach marginalizes out the corresponding pose nodes from the graph. To avoid a densely connected pose graph, which would result from exact marginalization, we propose an approximation to marginalization that is based on local Chow-Liu trees and maintains a sparse graph. Real world experiments suggest that our approach effectively reduces the growth of the pose graph while minimizing the loss of information in the resulting grid map.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iros.2011.6094414

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. 10.1109/IROS.2009.5354121 · DOI
  2. krause, 0, Near-optimal nonmyopic value of information in graphical models, Proc of Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI)
  3. 10.1007/s13218-010-0034-2 · DOI
  4. mackay, 2003, Information Theory Inference and Learning Algorithms
  5. olson, 2008, Robust and Efficient Robotic Mapping
  6. 10.1109/CVPR.2008.4587678 · DOI
  7. 10.1109/IROS.2010.5649205 · DOI
  8. 10.1109/ICCV.2005.29 · DOI
  9. 10.1109/ROBOT.2010.5509407 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1109/TRO.2006.886264 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.robot.2009.06.008 · DOI
  12. 10.1109/TRO.2009.2034435 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1109/TIT.1968.1054142 · DOI
  14. cheeseman, 1986, On the representation and estimation of spatial uncertainty, Int Journal of Robotics, 5, 56, 10.1177/027836498600500404 · DOI
  15. 10.1109/TRO.2008.2004832 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kretzschmar, H., Stachniss, C., & Grisetti, G.
Affiliations
University of Freiburg (DE)
Venue
2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2011-09
Pages
865-871
ISSN
2153-0858 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2134396142
Cited by
48
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
FWCI
10.51
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Target Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
Keywords
graph-based SLAM, information-theoretic compression, laser rangefinder, occupancy grid, marginalization, Chow-Liu trees, sparse graphs, information gain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review