The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The event-camera dataset and simulator: Event-based data for pose estimation, visual odometry, and SLAM
Open accessAbstract
New vision sensors, such as the dynamic and active-pixel vision sensor (DAVIS), incorporate a conventional global-shutter camera and an event-based sensor in the same pixel array. These sensors have great potential for high-speed robotics and computer vision because they allow us to combine the benefits of conventional cameras with those of event-based sensors: low latency, high temporal resolution, and very high dynamic range. However, new algorithms are required to exploit the sensor characteristics and cope with its unconventional output, which consists of a stream of asynchronous brightness changes (called “events”) and synchronous grayscale frames. For this purpose, we present and release a collection of datasets captured with a DAVIS in a variety of synthetic and real environments, which we hope will motivate research on new algorithms for high-speed and high-dynamic-range robotics and computer-vision applications. In addition to global-shutter intensity images and asynchronous events, we provide inertial measurements and ground-truth camera poses from a motion-capture system. The latter allows comparing the pose accuracy of ego-motion estimation algorithms quantitatively. All the data are released both as standard text files and binary files (i.e. rosbag). This paper provides an overview of the available data and describes a simulator that we release open-source to create synthetic event-camera data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Gallego, G., Delbruck, T., Orchard, G., Bartolozzi, C., Taba, B., Censi, A., Leutenegger, S., Davison, A. J., Conradt, J., Daniilidis, K., et al. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2020.3008413 · Cited by 2,566
Self-citationEvent-driven Re-Id: A New Benchmark and Method Towards Privacy-Preserving Person Re-Identification
Ahmad, S., Scarpellini, G., Morerio, P., & Bue, A. D. (2022) · 2022 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision Workshops (WACVW) · doi:10.1109/wacvw54805.2022.00052 · Cited by 54
High Speed and High Dynamic Range Video with an Event Camera
Rebecq, H., Ranftl, R., Koltun, V., & Scaramuzza, D. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2019.2963386 · Cited by 50
Self-citationLifting Monocular Events to 3D Human Poses
Scarpellini, G., Morerio, P., & Del Bue, A. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) · doi:10.1109/cvprw53098.2021.00150 · Cited by 31
Towards Bridging the Space Domain Gap for Satellite Pose Estimation using Event Sensing
Jawaid, M., Elms, E., Latif, Y., & Chin, T.-J. (2023) · 2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) · doi:10.1109/icra48891.2023.10160531 · Cited by 32
Event Encryption for Neuromorphic Vision Sensors: Framework, Algorithm, and Evaluation
Du, B., Li, W., Wang, Z., Xu, M., Gao, T., Li, J., & Wen, H. (2021) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s21134320 · Cited by 18
Ahmad, S., Morerio, P., & Del Bue, A. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3399539 · Cited by 16
“Moreover, generating event-based synthetic datasets can be facilitated using event camera simulators [22], [25], [26].”
Method
Metadata
- Authors
- Mueggler, E., Rebecq, H., Gallego, G., Delbruck, T., & Scaramuzza, D.
- Venue
- The International Journal of Robotics Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2017-02
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 142-149
- ISSN
- 0278-3649 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-3176
- OpenAlex
- W2567239141
- Cited by
- 606
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 30.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.