Cited by 32Space Satellite Systems and ControlDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningSpacecraft Dynamics and Control

Towards Bridging the Space Domain Gap for Satellite Pose Estimation using Event Sensing

Open access
Jawaid, Mohsi, Elms, Ethan, Latif, Yasir, Chin, Tat-Jun·2023·2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)

Abstract

Deep models trained using synthetic data require domain adaptation to bridge the gap between the simulation and target environments. State-of-the-art domain adaptation methods often demand sufficient amounts of (unlabelled) data from the target domain. However, this need is difficult to fulfil when the target domain is an extreme environment, such as space. In this paper, our target problem is close proximity satellite pose estimation, where it is costly to obtain images of satellites from actual rendezvous missions. We demonstrate that event sensing offers a promising solution to generalise from the simulation to the target domain under stark illumination differences. Our main contribution is an event-based satellite pose estimation technique, trained purely on synthetic event data with basic data augmentation to improve robustness against practical (noisy) event sensors. Underpinning our method is a novel dataset with carefully calibrated ground truth, comprising of real event data obtained by emulating satellite rendezvous scenarios in the lab under drastic lighting conditions. Results on the dataset showed that our event-based satellite pose estimation method, trained only on synthetic data without adaptation, could generalise to the target domain effectively.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icra48891.2023.10160531

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A domain gap exists between real and synthetically generated space-borne datasets that affects the performance and accuracy of learning-based architectures.

    “Fourth, the domain gap exists between real and synthetically generated space-borne datasets that affect the performance and accuracy of learning-based architectures [21,23].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 52 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jawaid, M., Elms, E., Latif, Y., & Chin, T.-J.
Affiliations
Australian Institute for Machine Learning (AIML),Sentient Satellites Laboratory (SSL),Adelaide,Australia
Venue
2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2023-05-29
Pages
11866-11873
ISSN
1050-4729 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4383097421
Cited by
32
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 2
FWCI
16.88
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Northrop Grumman
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Space Satellite Systems and Control
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Dynamics and Control
Keywords
satellite pose estimation, event cameras, domain adaptation, sim-to-real transfer, satellite rendezvous, synthetic data, data augmentation, illumination variation, ground truth dataset

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review