Sensor models and multisensor integration
Abstract
We maintain that the key to intelligent fusion of disparate sensory information is to provide an effective model of sensor capabilities. A sensor model is an abstraction of the actual sensing process. It describes the information a sensor is able to provide, how this information is limited by the environ ment, how it can be enhanced by information obtained from other sensors, and how it may be improved by active use of the physical sensing device. The importance of having a model of sensor performance is that capabilities can be esti mated a priori and, thus, sensor strategies developed in line with information requirements. We describe a technique for modeling sensors and the information they provide. This model treats each sensor as an individual decision maker, acting as a member of a team with common goals. Each sensor is considered as a source of uncertain geometric information, able to communicate to, and coordinate its activities with, other members of the sens ing team. We treat three components of this sensor model: the observation model, which describes a sensor's measure ment characteristics; the dependency model, which describes a sensor's dependence on information from other sources; and the state model, which describes how a sensor's observa tions are affected by its location and internal state. We show how this mechanism can be used to manipulate, communi cate, and integrate uncertain sensor observations. We show that these sensor models can deal effectively with cooperative, competitive, and complementary interactions between differ ent disparate information sources.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The advantages of data fusion can be categorized as complementary, redundant and cooperative features, though these are not mutually exclusive.
“More specifically, the advantages of data fusion can be categorized as complementary, redundant and cooperative features [4, 5], though these are not mutually exclusive.”
From Multimodal deep learning for biomedical data fusion: a review (2022) · cites this paper as [4]
Cites
Huber, P. J. (1981) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471725250 · Cited by 7,066 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rahmani, A. M., Gia, T. N., Negash, B., Anzanpour, A., Azimi, I., Jiang, M., & Liljeberg, P. (2018) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2017.02.014 · Cited by 1,198 · see citing works
A Review of Data Fusion Techniques
Castanedo, F. (2013) · The Scientific World Journal · doi:10.1155/2013/704504 · Cited by 1,027 · see citing works
Multimodal deep learning for biomedical data fusion: a review
Stahlschmidt, S. R., Ulfenborg, B., & Synnergren, J. (2022) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbab569 · Cited by 766 · see citing works
“More specifically, the advantages of data fusion can be categorized as complementary, redundant and cooperative features [4, 5], though these are not mutually exclusive.”
BackgroundSensor Technologies for Intelligent Transportation Systems
Guerrero-Ibáñez, J., Zeadally, S., & Contreras-Castillo, J. (2018) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s18041212 · Cited by 637 · see citing works
Multimodal machine learning in precision health: A scoping review
Kline, A., Wang, H., Li, Y., Dennis, S., Hutch, M., Xu, Z., Wang, F., Cheng, F., & Luo, Y. (2022) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-022-00712-8 · Cited by 528 · see citing works
“Bayesian ’ s methods are typically employed at this level 40 to support a voting process between the set of models into a global decision.”
MethodData fusion in intelligent transportation systems: Progress and challenges – A survey
Faouzi, N.-E. E., Leung, H., & Kurian, A. (2011) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2010.06.001 · Cited by 444 · see citing works
Multimodal Sensor Fusion with Differentiable Filters
Lee, M. A., Yi, B., Martin-Martin, R., Savarese, S., & Bohg, J. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros45743.2020.9341579 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
“and multimodal state estimation for decades [2, 7, 21].”
Information Quality Assessment for Data Fusion Systems
Becerra, M. A., Tobón, C., Castro-Ospina, A. E., & Peluffo-Ordóñez, D. H. (2021) · Data · doi:10.3390/data6060060 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
IoT Data Quality Assessment Framework Using Adaptive Weighted Estimation Fusion
Byabazaire, J., O’Hare, G. M. P., Collier, R., & Delaney, D. (2023) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s23135993 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
- Authors
- Durrant-Whyte, H. F.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Durrant-Whyte, Hugh F.
- Venue
- The International Journal of Robotics Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1988-12
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 97-113
- ISSN
- 0278-3649 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-3176
- OpenAlex
- W2002748000
- Cited by
- 352
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 22
- FWCI
- 7.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The International Journal of Robotics Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Target Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Inertial Sensor and Navigation
- Keywords
- sensor modeling, multi-sensor integration, sensor fusion, observation model, dependence modeling, state model, information needs
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review