Cited by 352Target Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor NetworksRobotics and Sensor-Based LocalizationInertial Sensor and Navigation

Sensor models and multisensor integration

Durrant-Whyte, Hugh F.·1988·The International Journal of Robotics Research

Abstract

We maintain that the key to intelligent fusion of disparate sensory information is to provide an effective model of sensor capabilities. A sensor model is an abstraction of the actual sensing process. It describes the information a sensor is able to provide, how this information is limited by the environ ment, how it can be enhanced by information obtained from other sensors, and how it may be improved by active use of the physical sensing device. The importance of having a model of sensor performance is that capabilities can be esti mated a priori and, thus, sensor strategies developed in line with information requirements. We describe a technique for modeling sensors and the information they provide. This model treats each sensor as an individual decision maker, acting as a member of a team with common goals. Each sensor is considered as a source of uncertain geometric information, able to communicate to, and coordinate its activities with, other members of the sens ing team. We treat three components of this sensor model: the observation model, which describes a sensor's measure ment characteristics; the dependency model, which describes a sensor's dependence on information from other sources; and the state model, which describes how a sensor's observa tions are affected by its location and internal state. We show how this mechanism can be used to manipulate, communi cate, and integrate uncertain sensor observations. We show that these sensor models can deal effectively with cooperative, competitive, and complementary interactions between differ ent disparate information sources.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/027836498800700608

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The advantages of data fusion can be categorized as complementary, redundant and cooperative features, though these are not mutually exclusive.

    “More specifically, the advantages of data fusion can be categorized as complementary, redundant and cooperative features [4, 5], though these are not mutually exclusive.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Durrant-Whyte, H. F.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Durrant-Whyte, Hugh F.
Venue
The International Journal of Robotics Research
Published
1988-12
Volume
7
Issue
6
Pages
97-113
ISSN
  • 0278-3649 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-3176
OpenAlex
W2002748000
Cited by
352
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 22
FWCI
7.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The International Journal of Robotics Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Target Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Inertial Sensor and Navigation
Keywords
sensor modeling, multi-sensor integration, sensor fusion, observation model, dependence modeling, state model, information needs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review