The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Randomized Kinodynamic Motion Planning with Moving Obstacles
Abstract
This paper presents a novel randomized motion planner for robots that must achieve a specified goal under kinematic and/or dynamic motion constraints while avoiding collision with moving obstacles with known trajectories. The planner encodes the motion constraints on the robot with a control system and samples the robot's state × time space by picking control inputs at random and integrating its equations of motion. The result is a probabilistic roadmap of sampled state × time points, called milestones, connected by short admissible trajectories. The planner does not precompute the roadmap; instead, for each planning query, it generates a new roadmap to connect an initial and a goal state× time point. The paper presents a detailed analysis of the planner's convergence rate. It shows that, if the state× time space satisfies a geometric property called expansiveness, then a slightly idealized version of our implemented planner is guaranteed to find a trajectory when one exists, with probability quickly converging to 1, as the number of milestones increases. Our planner was tested extensively not only in simulated environments, but also on a real robot. In the latter case, a vision module estimates obstacle motions just before planning starts. The planner is then allocated a small, fixed amount of time to compute a trajectory. If a change in the expected motion of the obstacles is detected while the robot executes the planned trajectory, the planner recomputes a trajectory on the fly. Experiments on the real robot led to several extensions of the planner in order to deal with time delays and uncertainties that are inherent to an integrated robotic system interacting with the physical world.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Probabilistic roadmaps for path planning in high-dimensional configuration spaces
Kavraki, L. E., Svestka, P., Latombe, J.-C., & Overmars, M. H. (1996) · IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation · doi:10.1109/70.508439 · Cited by 6,343 · cited 4×
“An important distinction exists between multi-query strategies (e.g., Kavraki et al. (1996)) and single-query ones (e.g., Hsu, Latombe, and Motwani (1997)).”
InfluentialSelf-citationNonlinear controllability and observability
Hermann, R., & Krener, A. (1977) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.1977.1101601 · Cited by 2,374 · cited 1×
“All these methods require the robots to be locally controllable (Barraquand and Latombe 1993; Hermann and Krener 1977; Li, Canny, and Heinzinger 1990; Lynch and Mason 1996).”
MethodOBBTree: a hierarchical structure for rapid interference detection
Gottschalk, S., Lin, M. C., & Manocha, D. (1996) · Proceedings of the 23rd annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques · doi:10.1145/237170.237244 · Cited by 2,081
Stable Pushing: Mechanics, Controllability, and Planning
Lynch, K. M., & Mason, M. T. (1996) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/027836499601500602 · Cited by 463
Cited by
Gammell, J. D., Srinivasa, S. S., & Barfoot, T. D. (2014) · 2014 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems · doi:10.1109/iros.2014.6942976 · Cited by 1,207
A review of mobile robots: Concepts, methods, theoretical framework, and applications
Rubio, F., Valero, F., & Llopis-Albert, C. (2019) · International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems · doi:10.1177/1729881419839596 · Cited by 763
Perception, Planning, Control, and Coordination for Autonomous Vehicles
Pendleton, S., Andersen, H., Du, X., Shen, X., Meghjani, M., Eng, Y., Rus, D., & Ang, M. (2017) · Machines · doi:10.3390/machines5010006 · Cited by 657
The Hybrid Reciprocal Velocity Obstacle
Snape, J., Berg, J. V. D., Guy, S. J., & Manocha, D. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Robotics · doi:10.1109/tro.2011.2120810 · Cited by 448
Survey of Robot 3D Path Planning Algorithms
Yang, L., Qi, J., Song, D., Xiao, J., Han, J., & Xia, Y. (2016) · Journal of Control Science and Engineering · doi:10.1155/2016/7426913 · Cited by 328
Metadata
- Authors
- Hsu, D., Kindel, R., Latombe, J.-C., & Rock, S.
- Venue
- The International Journal of Robotics Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2002-03
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 233-255
- ISSN
- 0278-3649 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-3176
- OpenAlex
- W2036016432
- Cited by
- 771
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 29.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Randomized Kinodynamic Motion Planning with Moving Obstacles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/027836402320556421
- The paper
- Hsu, D., Kindel, R., Latombe, J.-C., & Rock, S. (2002). Randomized Kinodynamic Motion Planning with Moving Obstacles. The International Journal of Robotics Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/027836402320556421
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.