Cited by 115

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Perceived Stakeholder Role Relationships and Adoption of Seismic Hazard Adjustments 1

Arlikatti, Sudha, Lindell, Michael K., Prater, Carla S.·2007·International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters

Abstract

This study examined the relationships among perceived stakeholder characteristics, risk perceptions, respondent characteristics, and self-reported adoption of 16 seismic hazard adjustments by residents in areas of high and medium seismic risk. Seven stakeholder types, ranging from the federal government to the respondents themselves, were rated on three characteristics—seismic hazard knowledge, trustworthiness, and responsibility for taking action to protect households. Respondents rated their hazard knowledge as higher than that of peers, indicating optimistic bias. However, they also rated their hazard knowledge as lower than that of authorities and the news media—confirming that there are limits to optimistic bias. Partial correlation analyses indicated that perceived stakeholder characteristics influenced hazard adjustment by both central and peripheral routes to behavioral change. Paradoxically, respondents’ adoption of hazard adjustments was more strongly correlated with the perceived characteristics of peers, even though these were rated lower on hazard knowledge, trustworthiness, and protection responsibility. Although the effects were marginally significant, perceived stakeholder characteristics were related to respondents’ characteristics (location, gender, and ethnicity). This suggests risk communicators should consider tailoring their choice of sources as well as the content of their messages to different audience segments.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/028072700702500302

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 89

  1. 10.1023/A:1010655705069 · DOI
  2. 10.1086/378961 · DOI
  3. Berscheid E., 1985, The Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 2, 3rd ed., 413
  4. 10.1193/1.1585988 · DOI
  5. Burton I., 1978, The Environment as Hazard.
  6. Chaiken S., 1987, Social Influence: The Ontario Symposium, Vol. 5, 3
  7. Cohen J., 1988, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed.
  8. 10.1037/0033-2909.90.2.218 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1086/318638 · DOI
  10. Dillman D. A., 1978, Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method.
  11. 10.1016/B978-0-12-598226-9.50016-1 · DOI
  12. 10.1007/978-1-4612-4960-3 · DOI
  13. Eagly A.H., 1993, The Psychology of Attitudes.
  14. Fishbein M., 1975, Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research.
  15. Fothergill A., 1996, International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disaster., 14, 33, 10.1177/028072709601400103 · DOI
  16. 10.1111/1467-7717.00111 · DOI
  17. French J.R.P., 1959, Studies in Social Power, 150
  18. 10.1111/j.0272-4332.2003.00385.x · DOI
  19. Gallup Organization., 2003, The Gallup Poll Tuesday Briefing., 32
  20. Garcia E. M., 1989, Urban Resources, 5, 15
  21. Gladwin C.H., Gladwin H., and Peacock W.G. 2001. “Modeling Hurricane Evacuation Decisions with Ethnographic Methods.” International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters 19: 117–143. Available at www.ijmed.org. · DOI
  22. Gnanadesikan R., 1977, Methods for Statistical Data Analysis of Multivariate Observations.
  23. Godschalk D., 1994, Pulling Together: A Planning and Development Consensus Building Manual.
  24. 10.1002/mar.10090 · DOI
  25. 10.1007/BF02289015 · DOI
  26. 10.1006/jevp.2000.0190 · DOI
  27. Jackson E. L., 1977, California Geology, 30, 278
  28. 10.1177/0013916581134001 · DOI
  29. 10.1037/0021-9010.69.2.307 · DOI
  30. 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1992.tb01950.x · DOI
  31. 10.1086/317759 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.jesp.2004.04.006 · DOI
  33. 10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.569 · DOI
  34. 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00668.x · DOI
  35. 10.1177/0146167287134011 · DOI
  36. 10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.1163 · DOI
  37. Lindell M. K. 1994. “Perceived Characteristics of Environmental Hazards.” International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters 12: 303–326. Available at www.ijmed.org. · DOI
  38. 10.1037/0021-9010.84.4.640 · DOI
  39. 10.1037/0021-9010.85.3.331 · DOI
  40. 10.1177/01466219922031257 · DOI
  41. 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1990.tb00522.x · DOI
  42. Lindell M.K., 1992, Behavioral Foundations of Community Emergency Planning.
  43. 10.1177/00139160021972621 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.4135/9781452229188 · DOI
  45. Lindell M.K., and Prater C.S. 2000. “Household Adoption of Seismic Hazard Adjustments: A Comparison of Residents in Two States.” International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters 18: 317–38. Available at www.ijmed.org. · DOI
  46. 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb01868.x · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1111/0272-4332.00002 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Major A. M. 1999. “Gender Differences in Risk and Communication Behavior: Responses to the New Madrid Earthquake Prediction.” International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters 17: 313–338. Available at www.ijmed.org. · DOI
  49. 10.1007/BF02393621 · DOI
  50. McGuire W. J., 1985, The Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 2, 3rd ed., 233
  51. 10.1177/107769908806500301 · DOI
  52. Mileti D. S., 1980, Sociology and Social Research, 64, 327
  53. Mileti D.S., and Darlington J.D. 1995. “Societal Response to Revised Earthquake Probabilities in the San Francisco Bay Area.” International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters 13: 119–145. Available at www.ijmed.org. · DOI
  54. 10.2307/3096875 · DOI
  55. Mileti D. S., 1993, The Great Earthquake Experiment: Risk Communication and Public Action.
  56. 10.1016/S0304-3894(00)00179-5 · DOI
  57. Mulilis J. P. 1999. “Gender and Earthquake Preparedness.” Australian Journal of Emergency Management 14: 41–50. Available at www.gdnonline.org.
  58. 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1997.tb01623.x · DOI
  59. 10.1007/BF00124393 · DOI
  60. 10.1080/01944360208976265 · DOI
  61. 10.1108/09653560310480686 · DOI · Paper page
  62. Paton D., 1999, Journal of the American Society of Professional Emergency Planners, 6, 37
  63. Perry R.W., and Lindell M.K. 1991. “The Effects of Ethnicity on Evacuation Decision-Making.” International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters 9: 47–68. Available at www.ijmed.org. · DOI
  64. 10.1007/978-1-4612-4964-1 · DOI · Paper page
  65. 10.1111/j.1541-1338.1991.tb00289.x · DOI
  66. 10.1111/1539-6924.00373 · DOI
  67. 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2000)1:2(73) · DOI
  68. Raven B. H., 1965, Current Studies in Social Psychology, 371
  69. 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1993.tb01191.x · DOI
  70. 10.1007/978-94-009-1952-5_10 · DOI
  71. 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1996.tb01778.x · DOI
  72. 10.1177/0013916595276002 · DOI · Paper page
  73. Schuman H., 1985, Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol.1, 3rd ed., 635
  74. 10.1086/268958 · DOI
  75. 10.1086/322849 · DOI
  76. 10.1111/1539-6924.00349 · DOI
  77. 10.1126/science.3563507 · DOI · Paper page
  78. Slovic P., 1992, Social Theories of Risk, 117
  79. Spittal M.J., 2005, The Australasian Journal of Disaster and Trauma Studies, 2005, 1
  80. 10.1111/1539-6924.00313 · DOI
  81. Turner J. C., 1991, Social Influence.
  82. 10.1525/9780520329850 · DOI
  83. U.S. Department of Commerce., 1994, County and City Data Book.
  84. 10.1037/0021-9010.90.1.108 · DOI
  85. 10.1126/science.2686031 · DOI
  86. 10.1521/jscp.1996.15.1.1 · DOI
  87. 10.1037/0278-6133.12.3.235 · DOI
  88. 10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00414.x · DOI
  89. Wray R., Rivers J., Whitworth A., Jupka K., and Clements B. 2006. “Public Perceptions About Trust in Emergency Risk Communication: Qualitative Research Findings.” International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters 24: 45–75. Available at www.ijmed.org. · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Arlikatti, S., Lindell, M. K., & Prater, C. S.
Affiliations
  • Department of Public Administration University of North Texas
  • Hazard Reduction & Recovery Center Texas A&M University
Venue
International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters
Published
2007-11
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
218-256
ISSN
  • 0280-7270
  • 2753-5703
Cited by
115
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review