My Community, My Preparedness: The Role of Sense of Place, Community, and Confidence in Government in Disaster Readiness
Abstract
Preparedness for disasters is low in most populations, despite evidence that preparedness can reduce loss of life in hazard events. To better understand this lack of preparedness, the present study investigates how sense of community, sense of place, confidence in government, preparedness self-efficacy, and risk perception relate to household disaster preparedness. Preparedness self-efficacy and sense of community were found to be positive and significant predictors of preparedness. Risk perception was also found to be a partial mediator on preparedness self-efficacy with preparedness as the outcome variable. Implications for this project include the possible benefit of harnessing community connectedness (i.e., sense of community) and preparedness efficacy to enhance preparedness initiatives among neighbourhoods and households. Clarifying the role of trust in government in disaster events remains important in understanding the complexities of predicting preparedness behaviours.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Self-efficacy is positively associated with preparedness intentions and preparedness behaviors across disaster contexts, including university settings and earthquake-prone environments.
“Empirical evidence further indicates that self-efficacy is positively associated with preparedness intentions and preparedness behaviors across disaster contexts, including university settings and earthquake-prone environments [30][31][32].”
From A comparative study on Earthquake Preparedness of Japanese and International Students in a Nankai Trough Earthquake-threatened Area in Shikoku, Japan (2026) · cites this paper as [30]
Cites
Putting the fear back into fear appeals: the extended parallel process model
Witte, K. (1992) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637759209376276 · Cited by 3,880 · see citing works
A Meta-Analysis of Fear Appeals: Implications for Effective Public Health Campaigns
Witte, K., & Allen, M. (2000) · Health Education & Behavior · doi:10.1177/109019810002700506 · Cited by 3,216 · see citing works
The Protective Action Decision Model: Theoretical Modifications and Additional Evidence
Lindell, M. K., & Perry, R. W. (2012) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01647.x · Cited by 1,868 · see citing works
Community Resilience Interventions: Participatory, Assessment-Based, Action-Oriented Processes
Pfefferbaum, B., Pfefferbaum, R. L., & Van Horn, R. L. (2015) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/0002764214550298 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Atalyan, T., & Bhandary, N. P. (2026) · Natural Hazards Research · doi:10.1016/j.nhres.2026.07.004
- Authors
- DeYoung, S. E., & Peters, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Delaware (US)
- North Carolina State University (US)
- ORCID
- DeYoung, Sarah E.
- Venue
- International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2016-08
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 250-282
- ISSN
- 0280-7270 (ISSN-L)
- 2753-5703
- OpenAlex
- W4313568004
- Cited by
- 59
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 7.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
- Social Sciences › Communication › Public Relations and Crisis Communication
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Disaster Response and Management
- Keywords
- household disaster preparedness, sense of community, sense of place, public trust in government, risk perception, community ties, disaster preparedness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review