Cited by 12

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Identity Documents Bias Face Matching

Feng, Xinran, Burton, A. Mike·2019·Perception

Abstract

Unfamiliar face matching is a difficult task. In typical experiments, viewers see isolated face pairs and have to decide whether they show the same or different people. Recent research shows that embedding faces into passports introduces a response bias, such that viewers are more likely to accept two pictures as showing the same person. Here, we investigate the cause of this bias. In a series of experiments, we vary the apparent authority of the identity documents, testing passports, driving licences, and student ID. By comparison to isolated face matching, the results show a bias towards responding same person for each document type. However, when ID information (name, date of birth, etc.) was removed from documents, the induced bias disappeared. We conclude that bias does not rely on perceived authority, but instead seems to occur only in the presence of identifying information, despite that being task irrelevant.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0301006619877821

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Criterion is influenced by the applied context in which face matching is studied.

    “as well as the applied context in which face matching is studied (e.g., Bindemann et al., 2022;Feng & Burton, 2019, 2021;McCaffery & Burton, 2016;Tummon et al., 2019)”

    From A criterion-placement theory of face matching (2026) · cites this paper as Feng & Burton, 2019

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. 10.1068/p7008 · DOI
  2. 10.1371/journal.pone.0148148 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/j.concog.2005.06.001 · DOI
  4. 10.1186/s41235-018-0109-4 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1037/1076-898X.5.4.339 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1037/1076-898X.7.3.207 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.3758/BRM.42.1.286 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1068/p3335 · DOI
  9. 10.1111/bjop.12260 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.3758/BF03194801 · DOI
  11. 10.1080/09658210902976969 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.jarmac.2013.01.001 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199706)11:3<211::AID-ACP430>3.0.CO;2-O · DOI
  14. 10.1111/1467-9280.03453 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1002/acp.3281 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.3758/BF03193433 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1037/a0013464 · DOI
  18. 10.1002/acp.2965 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1037/0033-2909.116.2.220 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1073/pnas.1721355115 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1371/journal.pone.0103510 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Feng, X., & Burton, A. M.
Affiliations
Department of Psychology, University of York, UK
Venue
Perception
Published
2019-09-24
Volume
48
Issue
12
Pages
1163-1174
ISSN
  • 0301-0066
  • 1468-4233
Cited by
12
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review