Cited by 59Gender, Education, and Development IssuesIntimate Partner and Family ViolenceGender Studies and Social Issues

Characterizing gender-based violence in the context of water, sanitation, and hygiene: A scoping review of evidence in low- and middle-income countries

Nunbogu, Abraham Marshall, Elliott, Susan J.·2022·Water Security

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.wasec.2022.100113

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 85 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nunbogu, A. M., & Elliott, S. J.
Affiliations
University of Waterloo (CA)
Corresponding author
Nunbogu, Abraham Marshall
Venue
Water Security
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-04
Volume
15
Pages
100113
ISSN
2468-3124 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4220831076
Cited by
59
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 5
FWCI
22.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Water Security (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Gender, Education, and Development Issues
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Studies and Social Issues
Keywords
gender-based violence, water, sanitation and hygiene, violence against women, women and girls, low- and middle-income countries, gender norms, power relations, sexual violence, psychological violence, structural violence, social exclusion, marginalization, right to water and sanitation, conceptual framework, Sustainable Development Goal 5, SDG 6

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review