Applying Phenomenology in Research: Problems, Principles and Practice
Abstract
Interest in phenomenological research has been growing steadily over the last decade as researchers have sought to capture the richness of individual experience. However, the sheer complexity of ideas embedded within phenomenology is challenging. Confusions abound as to what phenomenology means, let alone how to apply it as a research method. Misconceptions and contradictions are apparent in the literature. This paper starts with a broad review of some current phenomenological literature relevant to occupational therapy. The key principles of the phenomenological approach are then clarified, followed by an exploration of how these might be applied practically in research.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Phenomenological methodologies contain similar and complementary values and aims to Pacific research.
“While it is true that phenomenological methodologies contain similar and complementary values and aims, including striving for an 'understanding [of the] distinctly existential, emotive, enactive, embodied, situational and nontheoretic', aspects of different human phenomena, and that it recognises Vaioleti's desire for specific address of the tension between 'what is unique and what is shared' (”
Cites
The Narrative Nature of Clinical Reasoning
Mattingly, C. (1991) · American Journal of Occupational Therapy · doi:10.5014/ajot.45.11.998 · Cited by 319 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In particular, Mattingly (1991) described how therapists used a phenomenological process to understand individuals' meanings.”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Suaalii‐Sauni, T., & Fulu‐Aiolupotea, S. M. (2014) · Asia Pacific Viewpoint · doi:10.1111/apv.12061 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
- Authors
- Finlay, L.
- Corresponding author
- Finlay, Linda
- Venue
- British Journal of Occupational Therapy
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1999-07
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 299-306
- ISSN
- 0308-0226 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-6006
- OpenAlex
- W2143945632
- Cited by
- 98
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 2.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- British Journal of Occupational Therapy (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
- Keywords
- phenomenology, phenomenological research, occupational therapy research, lived experience, research methodology, research practices
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review