Cited by 319Occupational Therapy Practice and ResearchEmpathy and Medical EducationMedicine, History, and Philosophy

The Narrative Nature of Clinical Reasoning

Mattingly, Cheryl·1991·American Journal of Occupational Therapy

Abstract

Narrative reasoning is a central mode of clinical reasoning in occupational therapy. Therapists reason narratively when they are concerned with disability as an illness experience, that is, with how a physiological condition is affecting a person’s life. In this paper, narrative reasoning is contrasted with propositional reasoning, and two kinds of narrative thinking are examined. The first is the use of narrative as a mode of speech that can be contrasted with biomedical discourse, in which disability is framed as physical pathology. The second involves the creation rather than the telling of stories. Therapists try to “emplot” therapeutic encounters with patients, that is, to help create a therapeutic story that becomes a meaningful short story in the larger life story of the patient.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5014/ajot.45.11.998

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mattingly, C.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Mattingly, Cheryl
Venue
American Journal of Occupational Therapy
Published
1991-11
Volume
45
Issue
11
Pages
998-1005
ISSN
  • 0272-9490 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-7676
OpenAlex
W2141806496
Cited by
319
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
FWCI
20.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Occupational Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Empathy and Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Medicine, History, and Philosophy
Keywords
narrative thinking, clinical reasoning, occupational therapy, propositional reasoning, biomedical discourse, emplotment, therapeutic stories, life stories, narrative therapy
MeSH terms
Clinical Competence, Communication, Creativity, Female, Humans, Imagination, Interprofessional Relations, Male, Occupational Therapy, Problem Solving, Professional-Patient Relations, Thinking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review