‘This isn’t forever for me’: Perceived employability and migrant gig work in Norway and Sweden
Open accessAbstract
Information asymmetry regarding local job prospects, imperfect portability of qualifications and a lack of host country language skills combine to reduce migrants’ perceptions of their own employability. As a result, platform mediated gig work has become a common labour market entry point for new migrants. However, there is a near-universal expectation among workers is that gig work will be undertaken short-term, rather than as the first step of a longer gig-career. While research has explored the individual and structural factors, there has been limited attention as to how the specific occupational context in which a worker is embedded can also shape workers’ perceived employability. In this article, I therefore present the results of 37 semi-structured interviews with migrant Foodora couriers across Norway and Sweden, exploring how the specific occupational context of gig work intersects with migrants’ perceived employability. This article identifies, firstly, that obtaining employment in gig work was not perceived to be a reflection of workers’ own local employability. Secondly, workers’ short-term temporal orientations shape how participants are able to cope with the physical, emotional and identity demands of gig work. Thirdly, workers have to re-frame their perceived employability in the face of what is perceived to be widespread discrimination in the local labour market context. Lastly, the specific occupational context of gig work was considered to be either of no value to future local employers, or a negative signal as to a worker’s skills and labour market integration.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Petriglieri, G., Ashford, S. J., & Wrzesniewski, A. (2019) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0001839218759646 · Cited by 744 · see citing works
Job quality, fair work and gig work: the lived experience of gig workers
Myhill, K., Richards, J., & Sang, K. (2021) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2020.1867612 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
The winners and the losers of the platform economy: who participates?
Hoang, L., Blank, G., & Quan-Haase, A. (2020) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2020.1720771 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Webster, N. A., & Zhang, Q. (2020) · NORA - Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research · doi:10.1080/08038740.2020.1714725 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Anthropotropism: Searching for Recognition in the Scandinavian Gig Economy
Newlands, G. (2022) · Sociology · doi:10.1177/00380385211063362 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bonhomme, M., & Muldoon, J. (2025) · Ethnic and Racial Studies · doi:10.1080/01419870.2024.2349268 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
“A growing number of recent studies have begun to show how migrant labour shapes the platform economy and intersects with other structural vulnerabilities experienced by migrant workers (Altenried 2021; Lam and Triandafylli-dou 2021; Newlands 2022).”
Influential
- Authors
- Newlands, G.
- Affiliations
- BI Norwegian Business School (NO)
- Corresponding author
- Newlands, Gemma
- ORCID
- Newlands, Gemma
- Venue
- Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2022-03-04
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1262-1279
- ISSN
- 0308-518X (ISSN-L)
- 1472-3409
- OpenAlex
- W4214940399
- Cited by
- 79
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3
- FWCI
- 19.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Environment and Planning A Economy and Space (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Norges Forskningsråd (275347)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Economy and Work Transformation
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration and Labor Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Employment, Labor, and Gender Studies
- Keywords
- perceived employability, platform work, labour market integration, occupational context, time orientation, employment discrimination, information asymmetry, language skills, labour market entry, migrant workers, Norway, Sweden
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review