Cited by 5Ancient Egypt and ArchaeologyBiblical Studies and InterpretationAncient Near East History

The Shoshenqs of Egypt and Palestine

Kitchen, K.A.·2001·Journal for the Study of the Old Testament

Abstract

Contrary to Frank Clancy's recent paper (‘Shishak/Shoshenq's Travels’, JSOT 86 [1999], pp. 3–23), the stela of a king Shoshenq found at Megiddo belongs, and can only belong, to Shoshenq I—it has nothing to do with Shoshenq IV (different car-touches) or any other Shoshenq. Shoshenq I indubitably reigned in the third quarter of the tenth century BCE, and no way as late as 800 BCE (as claimed in cranky literature). The campaign (and its date in Rehoboam's fifth year) remains historical fact, not merely a literary theme, and its geography clearly reached as far as Megiddo and Beth-Shan.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/030908920102509301

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kitchen, K. A.
Affiliations
University of Liverpool (GB)
Corresponding author
Kitchen, K.A.
Venue
Journal for the Study of the Old Testament
Published
2001-06
Volume
25
Issue
93
Pages
3-12
ISSN
  • 0309-0892 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-6728
OpenAlex
W2139065588
Cited by
5
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1
FWCI
4.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal for the Study of the Old Testament (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Near East History
Keywords
Rehoboam, 10th century BCE, Egyptian-Palestinian relations, Beth-shan, chronology, ancient Near Eastern kingship

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review