Cited by 85Biblical Studies and InterpretationArchaeology and Historical StudiesAncient and Medieval Archaeology Studies

Sub-dividing the Iron Age IIA in northern Israel: a suggested solution to the chronological debate

Herzog, Ze'ev, Singer-Avitz, Lily·2006·Tel Aviv

Abstract

In an earlier paper we discussed the 'high/low' chronology dispute as it relates to the archaeology of southern Palestine and suggested a solution that assigned two sub-phases to the Iron Age IIA. Here we suggest a similar solution for the northern regions of the country.Using the assemblages of Jezreel as a typological starting point we examine the artefacts and stratigraphy of several key northern sites. We maintain that northern Israel went through different social processes during the Iron Age IIA than did its neighbours to the south and that its Iron Age IIA chronology should be divided into three sub-phases: the Early Iron Age IIA, dated to the second half of the 10th century BCE, and the Late Iron Age IIA, with two sub-phases—the main phase, which dates to the first two-thirds of the 9th century, and the final phase, which dates to the last third of the 9th century.This observation should solve the on-going debate between the 'low' and 'high' chronologies. The different routes to statehood of the Kingdoms of Israel and Judah undoubtedly stem from the variegated environmental and social setting of the two regions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1179/tav.2006.2006.2.163

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Tel Rehov, Stratum VI represents the earlier phase of the period and strata V-IV the later phase.

    “The division of the Iron Age IIA into 2 sub-periods-early and late-as suggested by Herzog and Avitz-Singer (2006; see also Sharon et al. 2007:10-13 and our comment above in relation to Tel Dor) is now substantiated in the excavations of Tel Rehov, where Stratum VI represents the earlier phase of the period and strata V-IV the later phase.”

    From <sup>14</sup>C Dates and the Iron Age Chronology of Israel: A Response (2008) · cites this paper as Herzog and Avitz-Singer 2006

  • The division of the Iron Age IIA into 2 sub-periods-early and late-is now substantiated in the excavations of Tel Rehov.

    “The division of the Iron Age IIA into 2 sub-periods-early and late-as suggested by Herzog and Avitz-Singer (2006; see also Sharon et al. 2007:10-13 and our comment above in relation to Tel Dor) is now substantiated in the excavations of Tel Rehov, where Stratum VI represents the earlier phase of the period and strata V-IV the later phase.”

    From <sup>14</sup>C Dates and the Iron Age Chronology of Israel: A Response (2008) · cites this paper as Herzog and Avitz-Singer 2006

  • The Iron Age IIA can be divided into early and late phases, a phenomenon confirmed at Tel Rehov.

    “as discussed above, the Iron Age IIA can be divided into early and late phases (Herzog and Avitz-Singer 2006), a phenomenon confirmed at Tel Rehov.”

    From <sup>14</sup>C Dates and the Iron Age Chronology of Israel: A Response (2008) · cites this paper as Herzog and Avitz-Singer 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Herzog, Z., & Singer-Avitz, L.
Venue
Tel Aviv
Published
2006-08
Volume
33
Issue
2
Pages
163-195
ISSN
  • 0334-4355 (ISSN-L)
  • 2040-4786
OpenAlex
W2168943630
Cited by
85
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
46.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Tel Aviv (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Archaeology and Historical Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies
Keywords
Iron Age IIA, northern Israel, chronology, stratigraphy, artifacts, state formation, Kingdom of Israel, Kingdom of Judah, 10th century BCE, 9th century BCE

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review