The DOI matches its Crossref record; 96 of the 96 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
‘Nothing includes everything’: towards engaged pluralism in Anglophone economic geography
Abstract
Economic geography has become increasingly fragmented into a series of intellectual solitudes that has created isolation, producing monologues rather than conversation, and raising the question of how knowledge production should proceed. Inspired by science studies and feminism, we argue for an engaged pluralist approach to economic geography based on dialogue, translation, and the creation of ‘trading zones’. We envision a determinedly anti-monist and anti-reductionist discipline that recognizes and connects a diverse range of circulating local epistemologies: a politics of difference rather than of consensus or popularity. Our model is GIS that underwent significant shifts during the last decade by practicing engaged pluralism, and creating new forms of knowledge. Similar possibilities we suggest exist for economic geography.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective
Haraway, D. (1988) · Feminist Studies · doi:10.2307/3178066 · Cited by 18,364
Hegemony and Socialist Strategy
Mouffe, C., & Laclau, E. (1985) · Cited by 12,172
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
Hall, M. B., & Kuhn, T. S. (1963) · The American Historical Review · doi:10.2307/1847040 · Cited by 7,479
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective
Haraway, D. (1988) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 6,992
Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature
McNeil, M., & Haraway, D. J. (1992) · Feminist Review · doi:10.2307/1395245 · Cited by 6,794
Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science
Hacking, I. (1983) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511814563 · Cited by 4,814
Young, I. M. (2015) · Readings in Planning Theory · doi:10.1002/9781119084679.ch19 · Cited by 4,285
Latour, B. (1987) · Cited by 4,106
Simians, cyborgs, and women: the reinvention of nature
(1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-6234 · Cited by 3,677
The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes: Philosophical Papers
Lakatos, I. (1978) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511621123 · Cited by 3,045
Cited by
New Urban Spaces: Urban Theory and the Scale Question
Brenner, N. (2019) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190627188.001.0001 · Cited by 353
The boundaries of urban metabolism: Towards a political–industrial ecology
Newell, J. P., & Cousins, J. J. (2015) · Progress in Human Geography · doi:10.1177/0309132514558442 · Cited by 329
From ‘energy geography’ to ‘energy geographies’: Perspectives on a fertile academic borderland
Calvert, K. (2016) · Progress in Human Geography · doi:10.1177/0309132514566343 · Cited by 323
Metadata
- Authors
- Barnes, T. J., & Sheppard, E.
- Venue
- Progress in Human Geography
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-09-28
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 193-214
- ISSN
- 0309-1325 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-0288
- OpenAlex
- W1986255632
- Cited by
- 335
- References
- 96
- FWCI
- 65.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ‘Nothing includes everything’: towards engaged pluralism in Anglophone economic geography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0309132509343728
- The paper
- Barnes, T. J., & Sheppard, E. (2010). ‘Nothing includes everything’: towards engaged pluralism in Anglophone economic geography. Progress in Human Geography. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132509343728
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.