The DOI matches its Crossref record; 78 of the 78 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Preemption, precaution, preparedness: Anticipatory action and future geographies
Open accessAbstract
The paper focuses on how futures are anticipated and acted on in relation to a set of events that are taken to threaten liberal democracies. Across different domains of life the future is now problematized as a disruption, a surprise. This problematization of the future as indeterminate or uncertain has been met with an extraordinary proliferation of anticipatory action. The paper argues that anticipatory action works through the assembling of: styles through which the form of the future is disclosed and related to; practices that render specific futures present; and logics through which anticipatory action is legitimized, guided and enacted.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Risk Society, Towards a New Modernity
Leiss, W., Beck, U., Ritter, M., Lash, S., & Wynne, B. (1994) · Canadian Journal of Sociology / Cahiers canadiens de sociologie · doi:10.2307/3341155 · Cited by 12,546
Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity
Boyd, W., Beck, U., & Shrader-Frechette, K. S. (1993) · Economic Geography · doi:10.2307/143601 · Cited by 9,215
The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review
Stern, N. (2007) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511817434 · Cited by 8,371
Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought
Rose, N. (1999) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511488856 · Cited by 6,346
Powers of freedom: reframing political thought
(2000) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.37-3035 · Cited by 5,663
Giddens, A. (2023) · Social Theory Re-Wired · doi:10.4324/9781003320609-62 · Cited by 4,813
Hacking, I. (1990) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511819766 · Cited by 3,586
Gibson, K. (2006) · Cited by 3,056
Non-representational theory : space, politics, affect
Thrift, N. J. (2007) · doi:10.82444/warw.33626224 · Cited by 2,118
The concept of resilience revisited
Manyena, S. B. (2006) · Disasters · doi:10.1111/j.0361-3666.2006.00331.x · Cited by 1,731
Cited by
Assemblage thinking and actor‐network theory: conjunctions, disjunctions, cross‐fertilisations
Müller, M., & Schurr, C. (2016) · Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers · doi:10.1111/tran.12117 · Cited by 409
Affect and biopower: towards a politics of life
Anderson, B. (2012) · Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers · doi:10.1111/j.1475-5661.2011.00441.x · Cited by 368
Self-citationAnticipatory innovation governance: Shaping the future through proactive policy making
(2020) · OECD Working Papers on Public Governance · doi:10.1787/cce14d80-en · Cited by 303
A New Urban Dispositif? Governing Life in an Age of Climate Change
Braun, B. P. (2014) · Environment and Planning D: Society and Space · doi:10.1068/d4313 · Cited by 287
Speculative futures: Cities, data, and governance beyond smart urbanism
Leszczynski, A. (2016) · Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space · doi:10.1177/0308518x16651445 · Cited by 284
Metadata
- Authors
- Anderson, B.
- Venue
- Progress in Human Geography
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2010-04-09
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 777-798
- ISSN
- 0309-1325 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-0288
- OpenAlex
- W2133497446
- Cited by
- 1,204
- References
- 78
- FWCI
- 128.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Preemption, precaution, preparedness: Anticipatory action and future geographies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0309132510362600
- The paper
- Anderson, B. (2010). Preemption, precaution, preparedness: Anticipatory action and future geographies. Progress in Human Geography. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132510362600
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.