The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conceptualizing detention: Mobility, containment, bordering, and exclusion
Open accessAbstract
Detention is a pressing empirical, conceptual, and political issue. Detained populations, detention facilities, and industries have expanded globally. Detention is also a fundamentally geographical topic, yet largely overlooked by geographers. We argue that detention be conceptualized as a series of geographical processes. Operating through these processes are contradictory sets of temporal and spatial logics that structure the seemingly paradoxical geographies underpinning detention. These logics include containment and mobility, bordering and exclusion. We trace these logics through an emergent literature, synthesizing and analyzing important geographic themes in the field. We identify contributions by and new avenues of inquiry for geographers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Homo sacer: sovereign power and bare life
(1999) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.36-4413 · Cited by 7,988
Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life
Agamben, G. (2020) · Stanford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9780804764025 · Cited by 7,078
Walled States, Waning Sovereignty
Brown, W. (2010) · Zone Books · doi:10.2307/j.ctv14gpj55 · Cited by 1,797
Harvard Civil Rights: Civil Liberties Law Review
Alday, R. E. (1993) · Derechos y libertades: Revista de Filosofía del Derecho y derechos humanos · Cited by 1,436
(2001) · Progress in Human Geography · doi:10.1191/030913201682688913 · Cited by 1,293
(2007) · Cited by 1,200
Children of Global Migration: Transnational Families and Gendered Woes
Parreñas, R. (2005) · Stanford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781503624627 · Cited by 1,163
Biometric borders: Governing mobilities in the war on terror
Amoore, L. (2006) · Political Geography · doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2006.02.001 · Cited by 1,060
Children of global migration: transnational families and gendered woes
(2006) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.43-3719 · Cited by 955
(2011) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199600458.001.0001 · Cited by 486
Cited by
Conceptualizing the carceral in carceral geography
Moran, D., Turner, J., & Schliehe, A. K. (2018) · Progress in Human Geography · doi:10.1177/0309132517710352 · Cited by 293
Bergen, H., & Abji, S. (2020) · Affilia · doi:10.1177/0886109919866165 · Cited by 43
Silverman, S. J., & Kaytaz, E. S. (2022) · Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies · doi:10.1080/1369183x.2020.1841613 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Mountz, A., Coddington, K., Catania, R. T., & Loyd, J. M.
- Venue
- Progress in Human Geography
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2012-10-15
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 522-541
- ISSN
- 0309-1325 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-0288
- OpenAlex
- W2021062536
- Cited by
- 288
- References
- 60
- FWCI
- 39.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Conceptualizing detention: Mobility, containment, bordering, and exclusion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0309132512460903
- The paper
- Mountz, A., Coddington, K., Catania, R. T., & Loyd, J. M. (2013). Conceptualizing detention: Mobility, containment, bordering, and exclusion. Progress in Human Geography. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132512460903
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
